Ding et al. [1] proposed a new method to better quantify myocardial perfusion called TIMI myocardial perfusion frame count (TMPFC). By counting frames of contrast passing through the perfusion bed beyond the stenotic infarct related artery, a quantitative advance over the longstanding qualitative TIMI myocardial perfusion grading (TMPG) and myocardial blush grading (MBG) assessments can be made. The TMPFC differed from the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) in that the first frame of the TMPFC was defined as that frame where the first appearance of myocardial blush beyond the infarct related artery was seen. The last was that frame in which the contrast blush disappeared.TMPFC was calculated in 45 normal coronary arteries in 15 patients and 137 culprit arteries in 137 primary angioplasty patients. For normal arteries, mean TMPFC was 83.5 1/2 18, ranging from 78 to 89, and TMPFC number <90 was the delimiter of normal myocardial perfusion. In the culprit artery undergoing primary PCI, the RCA, LAD, and circumflex had TMPFCs of 141, 112, and 102 frames, respectively. Suboptimal perfusion had higher TMPFCs. More importantly and clinically relevant is that the multivariant analysis showed that the TMPFC was independent predictor of 30-day and 6-month MACE, (both P < 0.02). TMPFC is a more quantitative index for the assessment of myocardial perfusion and similar to the TMPG in that the status of the microcirculation predicts prognosis after primary PCI.This relatively simple concept has been too long time in arriving to our world of digital angiography with techniques and nomenclature persisting as the extinction of cine film and frame rates years ago. Ding et al. should be congratulated in moving the assessment of acute infarct reperfusion forward from Gibson et al's [2] standard cine based approach. The fact that a digital frame count can be easily performed on any of the imaging computers makes this advance widely available in any laboratory. However, the novel methodology deserves a brief cautionary note. The operators still must apply some degree of subjectivity in selecting the first and last frames of contrast arrival and departure from the infarct vessel territory. Care should be taken to minimize superimposition of noninfarct regions. The correct assessment of myocardial blush washout needed to terminate the frame count might also be variable, despite the reporting of good intra-and inter-observer variability in the investigators' laboratory. Venous filling should not be mistaken for myocardial perfusion blush.The absence of myocardial blush certainly limits one's ability to use the TMPFC. This problem occurred in 10 study patients in whom no myocardial blush or persistence of myocardial blush in the distribution of the culprit artery was observed. The reproducibility of the technique appeared to be very satisfactory. It is interesting to note that the comparison with TMP grade 2 had very wide ranging TMPFC counts from 30 up to 209. For TIMI 3 grades, the TMPFC spectrum was shifted with the mode around 60 to 89...