2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timescales of seawater intrusion and retreat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely due to the change in the model's aspect ratio (the ratio of aquifer length to thickness), whereby decreasing this ratio (due to the increase of h s ) enhances SWI and therefore WTS. This is in agreement with the result of Werner and Simmons [] and Lu and Werner [] who showed that the extent of SWI is larger in a thicker coastal aquifer, in response to the same boundary head differences. Interestingly, x tip increased and x toe decreased with higher values of α L (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely due to the change in the model's aspect ratio (the ratio of aquifer length to thickness), whereby decreasing this ratio (due to the increase of h s ) enhances SWI and therefore WTS. This is in agreement with the result of Werner and Simmons [] and Lu and Werner [] who showed that the extent of SWI is larger in a thicker coastal aquifer, in response to the same boundary head differences. Interestingly, x tip increased and x toe decreased with higher values of α L (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SGD and the salt distribution attributed to a particular force must be determined with consideration of the influence of other forces both at the present and in the past. The response of SGD and saltwaterfreshwater mixing zone to the different forces is not instantaneous but delayed [Michael et al, 2005;Lu and Werner, 2013;Robinson et al, 2014;Xin et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2016;Yu et al, 2017]. This complicates the assessment of interactions between multiple forces.…”
Section: Interacting Effects Among Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often difficult to derive a clear understanding of the mechanisms affecting SWI directly from field‐based investigation (Werner et al, ). The challenge of measuring and quantifying coastal aquifer hydrodynamics and SWI in field sites has promoted the use of laboratory and numerical modelling tools to gain a valuable insight into SWI response to various geological and/or hydrological stresses, such as (a) change in seaward freshwater discharge resulting from fluctuations at the inland head boundary (Abdoulhalik & Ahmed, ; Abdoulhalik & Ahmed, ; Abdoulhalik, Ahmed, & Hamill, ; Goswami & Clement, ; Lu & Werner, ; Robinson, Ahmed, & Hamill, ; Robinson, Hamill, & Ahmed, ) in head‐controlled systems or from variations of the regional freshwater flux (Chang & Clement, ; Stoeckl & Houben, ; Stoeckl, Houben, & Dose, ) in flux‐controlled systems and (b) SLR (Hussain & Javadi, ; Morgan, Bakker, & Werner, ; Morgan, Stoeckl, Werner, & Post, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%