2009
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2009.9664268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timed Search Technique Used to Evlauate Freshwater Mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) Species Richness in Headwater Streams: Is a Single One-Hour Visit Enough?

Abstract: Freshwater mussels were sampled in the upper Mackinaw River basin, Illinois, for five years to determine if a single, one-hour visit was enough to adequately characterize the species richness at a headwater stream site when using the timed search technique. Eight sites were each handpicked for one person-hour every year, and species richness was calculated to determine if it varied by year for five years. During 39 person-hours, 2,692 live individuals of 14 species were collected. Species accumulation curves a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not indicated in this study's data, we have recently encountered these species through stream assessments in large river and tidal-fresh habitats as part of other studies while using the same informal visual search. Nonetheless, we realize the current methods may be insufficient to detect and characterize the true mussel richness in some habitats where species with cryptic life history traits reside (Metcalfe-Smith et al, 2001;Tiemann et al, 2009). However, a cursory comparison of our mussel richness data to that collected by the Maryland Natural Heritage Program using timed-snorkel surveys has shown good agreement between most small to medium sized streams and watersheds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although not indicated in this study's data, we have recently encountered these species through stream assessments in large river and tidal-fresh habitats as part of other studies while using the same informal visual search. Nonetheless, we realize the current methods may be insufficient to detect and characterize the true mussel richness in some habitats where species with cryptic life history traits reside (Metcalfe-Smith et al, 2001;Tiemann et al, 2009). However, a cursory comparison of our mussel richness data to that collected by the Maryland Natural Heritage Program using timed-snorkel surveys has shown good agreement between most small to medium sized streams and watersheds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…All collected mussels were placed in mesh bags until survey completion, at which time identifiable mussels were returned to the stream, and unidentified taxa were placed on ice and returned to the lab for identification [57,61,62]. These data allowed for calculation of catch per unit effort and relative abundance for each species, as well as assemblage richness and evenness at each study site ( [63]; but acknowledging concerns in [64]).…”
Section: Species Richness and Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research has been conducted regarding the requirements for the various sampling methods. For example, 1 hour has been deemed insufficient in species‐rich (14 species) headwater sites (Tiemann, Cummings, & Mayer, ). As for the area search methods, the bank‐to‐bank method has been suggested to be slightly more efficient (Dickson, ) than the quadrat method (for description of the sampling methods, see Strayer & Smith, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%