1992
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0031990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timed process algebras with urgent interactions and a unique powerful binary operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another phenomenon that we see in the literature is the use of negative antecedents in rules defining the operational semantics. We mention negative antecedents to operationally describe deadlock detection [18], sequencing [8], priorit.ies [4] probabilist.ic behaviour [19], urgency [10], and various real [17] and discrete time [2] set.t.ings. Now it will not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another phenomenon that we see in the literature is the use of negative antecedents in rules defining the operational semantics. We mention negative antecedents to operationally describe deadlock detection [18], sequencing [8], priorit.ies [4] probabilist.ic behaviour [19], urgency [10], and various real [17] and discrete time [2] set.t.ings. Now it will not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is equivalent to a stopping condition associated to the location that is the disjunction of the guards of all outgoing edges. The second kind of urgency, as for example defined in [6] and [3], is often available with restrictions only. E.g.…”
Section: Urgencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, predicates are used to express matters like (un)successful termination, convergence, divergence [10], enabledness [41], maximal delay, and side conditions [165]. Negative premises are used to describe, e.g., deadlock detection [137], sequencing [55], priorities [24,65], probabilistic behaviour [139], urgency [58], and various real [136] and discrete time [23,127,223] settings. Since predicates and negative premises are so pervasive, and often lead to cleaner semantic descriptions for many features and constructs of interest, we present the theory of SOS in a setting that deals explicitly with these notions as much as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%