2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00034-017-0501-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Varying Weighted Optimal Empirical Mode Decomposition Using Multiple Sets of Basis Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Weng and Barner, 2008), authors utilize a linear and a bidirectional weighting for the reconstruction of the denoised signal. Authors in (Kizilkaya and Elbi, 2017a, 2017b; Kizilkaya et al, 2016) developed an optimal signal reconstruction algorithm in which time-varying weights are determined for each of the oscillation modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Weng and Barner, 2008), authors utilize a linear and a bidirectional weighting for the reconstruction of the denoised signal. Authors in (Kizilkaya and Elbi, 2017a, 2017b; Kizilkaya et al, 2016) developed an optimal signal reconstruction algorithm in which time-varying weights are determined for each of the oscillation modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Lapin investigated a regularization method to identify the time-varying nonlinear systems by means of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. 32 Although these methods of expanding the time-varying parameters by using the wavelet models, [33][34][35] the known basis functions [36][37][38] and the different polynomials [39][40][41] can track rapidly or even sharply varying parameters, the basis functions mentioned among the above approaches need to be known and are hard to select. To overcome this roadblock, a modified least-squares algorithm with covariance resetting is proposed for linearly parametrized time-varying systems by constructing a local polynomial approximation model in a finite sufficiently small time interval.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%