The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-019-00748-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying wavelet estimation and its applications in deconvolution and seismic inversion

Abstract: Wavelet holds an essential role in seismic data processing and characterization, for examples deconvolution and seismic inversion. Unfortunately, wavelet is an unknown data. Several existing methods attempt to estimate and extract the wavelet from seismic data. However, the methods give only a single wavelet from one seismic trace. When seismic data are non-stationer, single wavelet usage will cause a problem, that is raising the error. This paper proposes a time-varying wavelet estimation method to accommodat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 is used implicitly in seismic inversion. For example, model-based inversion uses Eq.12 in its equation (Hampson-Russel Software, 1999;Pranowo, 2019).…”
Section: Direct-inversion Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 is used implicitly in seismic inversion. For example, model-based inversion uses Eq.12 in its equation (Hampson-Russel Software, 1999;Pranowo, 2019).…”
Section: Direct-inversion Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, Gabor deconvolution combines the essential ideas of stationary deconvolution and inverse Q filtering (Margrave et al, 2011), or assuming seismic traces are split into segments which are called the molecular-Gabor transform (Wang et al, 2013). Finally, in recent developments, time-varying deconvolution uses the lessassumption technique in its processes, such as using S-transform (Jia et al, 2017;Winardhi & Pranowo, 2019) or other mathematical approaches (Pranowo, 2019;van der Baan, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%