2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1407962/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying transmission heterogeneity of SARS and COVID-19 in Hong Kong

Abstract: Transmission heterogeneity is a notable feature of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemics, though previous efforts to estimate how heterogeneity changes over time are limited. Using contact tracing data, we compared the epidemiology of SARS and COVID-19 infection in Hong Kong in 2003 and 2020-21 and estimated time-varying transmission heterogeneity (kt) by fitting negative binomial models to offspring distributions generated across variable observation wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When secondary attack rate is higher, it is expected that more contacts are infected and therefore the observed number of secondary cases would be less heterogeneous. The strong association between p 0 and infectiousness variation suggests that the observed variations may also be attributed to some cases that are less infectious than average, which is consistent with Hong Kong data ( 53 ). In contrast, the SD of the distribution of number of secondary cases ( σ sec ) is only weakly correlated with infectiousness variation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…When secondary attack rate is higher, it is expected that more contacts are infected and therefore the observed number of secondary cases would be less heterogeneous. The strong association between p 0 and infectiousness variation suggests that the observed variations may also be attributed to some cases that are less infectious than average, which is consistent with Hong Kong data ( 53 ). In contrast, the SD of the distribution of number of secondary cases ( σ sec ) is only weakly correlated with infectiousness variation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Increasing evidence shows superspreading plays a substantial role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission, with a small proportion of infected individuals causing a large proportion of secondary cases. Previous studies estimated superspreading using the dispersion parameter k in transmission clusters in the range of 0.06 to 2.97 22,23 , while estimates using two clusters in Hong Kong between 2 and 21 January 2022 were around 0.2 and 0.33 for BA.1 and BA.2, respectively 24,25 . In more recent work, temporal changes in the dispersion parameter in Hong Kong was estimated to be closer to 0.1 when stringent PHSMs were in place 25 .…”
Section: An Estimation Of Incidence and Prevalence Based On Levels Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies estimated superspreading using the dispersion parameter k in transmission clusters in the range of 0.06 to 2.97 22,23 , while estimates using two clusters in Hong Kong between 2 and 21 January 2022 were around 0.2 and 0.33 for BA.1 and BA.2, respectively 24,25 . In more recent work, temporal changes in the dispersion parameter in Hong Kong was estimated to be closer to 0.1 when stringent PHSMs were in place 25 . Since most cases during January to April 2022 resulted from a single introduction of BA.2, we used phylodynamic models to compare the reported and estimated case numbers at varying degrees of overdispersion.…”
Section: An Estimation Of Incidence and Prevalence Based On Levels Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature estimates whose time window overlapped with our time windows found substantially lower levels of superspreading than what we observe (Figure 3c and corresponding overdispersion parameter shown in Figure S16). It is possible that contact tracing and modeling over- or under-estimates overdispersion due to missed contacts [20]. However, on the other hand, it may be the case that superspreading is not the only mechanism at play.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact tracing can directly measure superspreading by following the close contacts of infected individuals to measure the distribution of the number of secondary cases (the offspring number distribution) [2]. However, some secondary cases may be missed which can lead to measurement bias [20].…”
Section: Deme Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%