45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-1274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Varying Objective Functions for Optimum Shape Design via Control Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, an inflow Mach number variation was introduced into a non-linear frequency domain (NLFD) method, with which Nadarajah developed the NLFD-based adjoining optimization method. 4) The advantage of NLFD-based adjoining is its computational efficiency. Later, some other researchers also developed a time-accurate continuous and discrete adjoining method and surrogate model-based optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, an inflow Mach number variation was introduced into a non-linear frequency domain (NLFD) method, with which Nadarajah developed the NLFD-based adjoining optimization method. 4) The advantage of NLFD-based adjoining is its computational efficiency. Later, some other researchers also developed a time-accurate continuous and discrete adjoining method and surrogate model-based optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the above research simply treats the moment as a constraint, or even neglect it in the optimization model. 4) No research has been aimed at investigating the relation of drag and pitching moment in an unsteady flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%