1999
DOI: 10.5594/j04337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying Image Quality: Modeling the Relation between Instantaneous and Overall Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 30 s video sequences, Hands and Avons could observe a recency effect (i.e., presenting similar degradations earlier results in a lower impact on retrospective judgments) as well as a duration neglect (i.e., presenting either 5 or 10 s of reduced performance yielded similar retrospective judgments). For video sequences of up to 180 s duration, Hamberg and de Ridder [13] observed a recency effect and a peak effect while varying the duration of impairments from 2 to 10 s. With regard to shorter stimuli, effects on retrospective judgments tend to be unobservable (e.g., Ninassi et al [30] for 8 s video sequences). For (speech) telephony, mainly recency was investigated and observed (e.g., [2,7,8,13,27,34,43]).…”
Section: Perceived Quality Under Varying Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 30 s video sequences, Hands and Avons could observe a recency effect (i.e., presenting similar degradations earlier results in a lower impact on retrospective judgments) as well as a duration neglect (i.e., presenting either 5 or 10 s of reduced performance yielded similar retrospective judgments). For video sequences of up to 180 s duration, Hamberg and de Ridder [13] observed a recency effect and a peak effect while varying the duration of impairments from 2 to 10 s. With regard to shorter stimuli, effects on retrospective judgments tend to be unobservable (e.g., Ninassi et al [30] for 8 s video sequences). For (speech) telephony, mainly recency was investigated and observed (e.g., [2,7,8,13,27,34,43]).…”
Section: Perceived Quality Under Varying Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For video sequences of up to 180 s duration, Hamberg and de Ridder [13] observed a recency effect and a peak effect while varying the duration of impairments from 2 to 10 s. With regard to shorter stimuli, effects on retrospective judgments tend to be unobservable (e.g., Ninassi et al [30] for 8 s video sequences). For (speech) telephony, mainly recency was investigated and observed (e.g., [2,7,8,13,27,34,43]). Also a peak effect was observed (e.g., [2,27,43]).…”
Section: Perceived Quality Under Varying Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modeling, the relation between instantaneous and overall quality [41], we can identify two other phenomena related to the temporal context, namely the human memory effect and the expectation effect. The human memory effect is related to the fact that after a while the human gets used to a certain visual quality thus judging it more acceptable if it persists long enough.…”
Section: B Temporal Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence that viewers have non-symmetrical memory in that they are quick to criticize degradations in video quality but slow to reward improvements [23].…”
Section: Videomentioning
confidence: 99%