2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying identification model for dam behavior considering structural reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be noted that the upstream strain does not show seasonal trends compared to the downstream gauge which shows clear seasonal trends. As well, the downstream strain component ϵ z z for SG‐L4‐31 shows a decreasing trend with time which can be considered as irreversible () due to residual deformations during the initial adjustment period of the dam and foundation during reservoir filling, dissipation of heat of hydration, and chemical reactions in concrete or linear bias in the SGs used. In order to investigate this further, zero‐stress strains are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Dam Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be noted that the upstream strain does not show seasonal trends compared to the downstream gauge which shows clear seasonal trends. As well, the downstream strain component ϵ z z for SG‐L4‐31 shows a decreasing trend with time which can be considered as irreversible () due to residual deformations during the initial adjustment period of the dam and foundation during reservoir filling, dissipation of heat of hydration, and chemical reactions in concrete or linear bias in the SGs used. In order to investigate this further, zero‐stress strains are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Dam Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important issue is data reduction from hundreds of monitored instruments and the identification of critical parameters of dam responses. Previous studies have utilized principal component analysis,() artificial neural networks,() blind source separation,() artificial immune algorithm,() independent component regression,() cointegration theory,() and time‐varying Bayesian approach() to model and predict the dam responses. Time‐frequency analysis (short‐time Fourier transform) was employed by Mata et al() to identify the effect of daily variations of air temperature on the structural response of a concrete dam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dam displacement caused by the action of water load, temperature load and other loads, such as large fluctuations in water level due to landslide induced tsunamis and submarine landslides impacting the dam (Pudasaini 2014; Kafle et al 2016), it can be treated as the sum of hydrostatic pressure term, temperature term and time effect term. In the case study of this paper, the following factor set F is adopted to build the statistical model (Su et al 2012, 2015). where H represents the upstream reservoir water depth, t denotes the cumulative days from the monitoring day to the beginning day, θ  =  t /100.…”
Section: Actual Case Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical model can be described as follows (Su et al 2012, 2015). where y ′ denote the model calculation, a 0 , a i , b 1 i , b 2 i , d 1 , d 2 represent the regression coefficients.…”
Section: Actual Case Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] In recent years, there is a tendency towards employing advanced tools in the machine learning community to build predictive models. [17][18][19] Overall, these tools rely on data, and experience to select proper predictors as input, to build satisfactory implicit predictive models. Comparatively speaking, a limited number of studies have been done on statistical analysis of uplift pressure and leakage flow for gravity dams with penetrating cracks due to difficulties in generating mathematical models and result interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%