2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying hierarchical chains of salps with random weight networks for feature selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25] hybridised Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) with WOA for the FS problem. [1,[26][27][28] improved Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) for the FS problem. [15] used Social Spider Algorithm (SSA) for the FS problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] hybridised Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) with WOA for the FS problem. [1,[26][27][28] improved Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) for the FS problem. [15] used Social Spider Algorithm (SSA) for the FS problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to small positive sample size and severe unbalance between positive and negative samples (1:45) in historical behavioral data in the dataset, the already known data one month before (November 18-December 18) the behavioral prediction date (December 19) could not be simply extracted as data samples, which formed the training set of the user purchasing behavioral prediction model. Given this, a "sliding window"-centroid under-sampling combined balance method was raised to construct training set and test set [5,24] .…”
Section: Sample Construction and Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to small positive sample size and severe unbalance between positive and negative samples (1:45) in historical behavioral data in the dataset, the already known data one month before (November 18-December 18) the behavioral prediction date (December 19) could not be simply extracted as data samples, which formed the training set of the user purchasing behavioral prediction model. Given this, a "sliding window"-centroid under-sampling combined balance method was raised to construct training set and test set [5,24]. User's historical behaviors were divided into: browse, collect, add to cart and purchase.…”
Section: Sample Construction and Balancementioning
confidence: 99%