2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0266466609990648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Varying Cointegration

Abstract: In this paper we propose a time-varying vector error correction model in which the cointegrating relationship varies smoothly over time. The Johansen setup is a special case of our model. A likelihood ratio test for time-invariant cointegration is defined and its asymptotic chi-square distribution is derived. We apply our test to the purchasing power parity hypothesis of international prices and nominal exchange rates, and we find evidence of time-varying cointegration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
179
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
179
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chebyshev polynomials used by Bierens (1997), Bierens and Martins (2010), and in the present paper, are the ones of the "first kind." They are a special case of the Gegenbauer polynomials.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Chebyshev polynomials used by Bierens (1997), Bierens and Martins (2010), and in the present paper, are the ones of the "first kind." They are a special case of the Gegenbauer polynomials.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Hence, within the analysis of the order of integration of the variables, Bierens (1997) unit root tests, allow us to test whether the process is linear or non-linear trend stationary. In addition Bierens and Martins (2010) propose the use of Chebyshev polynomials in the framework of time-varying cointegrating parameters. There are several advantages in using these polynomials; first, since they are orthogonal, it avoids the problem of near collinearity in the regressors matrix in comparison with using regular time polynomials.…”
Section: The Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be possible by using the timevarying VECM framework, by Bierens and Martins (2010), which is an extension of the methods proposed by Johansen (1988Johansen ( , 1991Johansen ( , 1995 and allows to analyze the development of the cointegration relationship over time. Another promising approach in this research area might be using a Bayesian framework, for example Koop et al (2011) also offer the possibility to explicitly allow the cointegration space to evolve over time.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if fu t g is I(0)), we also employ "standard" tests with the null hypothesis of no cointegration (ADF, Z and Z t tests) 7 , as well as their counterparts that allow for regime shifts, developed by Gregory and Hansen (1996), in which the cointegrating vector may be subject to a regime shift at an unknown time under the alternative hypothesis. 8 In this framework, since the change point or its occurrence are unknown, the testing procedures involve computing the usual statistics (GH-AEG, GH-Z t and GH-Z ) for all possible break points and then selecting the smallest value obtained, since it will potentially present greater evidence against the null hypothesis of no cointegration.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same applies to structural change tests used as cointegration tests. 7 To choose an appropriate lag length for the ADF test, we adopt a downward testing selection procedure based on two-sided 5%-level t-type tests for the signi…cance of the coe¢ cient on the longest lag, with the maximum lag length set equal to 8. For the Z and Zt tests, the long-run variance of f t g is estimated by using a prewhitened quadratic spectral kernel estimator with a data-based bandwidth and a …rst-order autoregressive prewhitening …lter, as recommended in Andrews and Monahan (1992).…”
Section: Preliminary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%