2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.01063.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time trends in Swedish patch test data from 1992 to 2000. A multi‐centre study based on age‐ and sex‐adjusted results of the Swedish standard series

Abstract: Allergic contact dermatitis is recognized as a public health problem and some major allergens have been subject to intervention aiming at lowering skin exposure. There is an obvious interest in evaluating the effect of such interventions. Population studies are difficult to perform and epidemiological studies based on clinical data from testing patients with contact dermatitis are common surrogates. Our objective was to gather Swedish clinical standard series test data on two occasions in order to monitor tren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
60
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After the implementation of nickel regulation in the EU, nickel sensitization was significantly less among younger age groups, particularly in women. [14][15][16][17] In contrast to the findings in Europe, the prevalence of nickel allergy has increased steadily among all age groups in the United States. 11 A recent epidemiologic study of nickel allergy in America and China 18 found a significant increase in the prevalence of nickel allergy in the U.S. since 1970; a significant increase in the prevalence of nickel allergy in China was also seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the implementation of nickel regulation in the EU, nickel sensitization was significantly less among younger age groups, particularly in women. [14][15][16][17] In contrast to the findings in Europe, the prevalence of nickel allergy has increased steadily among all age groups in the United States. 11 A recent epidemiologic study of nickel allergy in America and China 18 found a significant increase in the prevalence of nickel allergy in the U.S. since 1970; a significant increase in the prevalence of nickel allergy in China was also seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…40 Although a decrease in nickel sensitization was seen after the implementation of regulations in Europe, the prevalence of cobalt allergy remained the same. [14][15][16][17]39,41 A study performed in Denmark to determine whether cobalt had replaced nickel in jewelry after the implementation of the EU Nickel Directive showed that cobalt was detected in only 1.1% of the items. 42 Another study looked at the cobalt release from cell phones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For practical reasons, reading ofthe patch test was carried out on day 4, which is recommended when only one reading is performed. Approximately 10% of patch-test reactions can be lost due to late-appearing reactions (20) and consequently, may introduce misclassification in patch-test results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relative frequency of positive reactions to gum rosin ranging from 2.2% to 5.2% with a mean of 4.0% (3.2% men and 4.5% female) was found. In a Swedish study (Lindberg et al 2007), a certain decrease in the prevalence of reactions to gum rosin was observed when comparing data from 1992 with those from 2000. More than 3,000 consecutive patients were tested in different clinics at these two occasions.…”
Section: Screening and Patch Testingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, this study showed a clear decrease in the prevalence in the ages <40 years compared to that seen in the older ages for men (2.0% compared with 3.4%) and also for women (2.0% compared with 5.4%). As the use of rosincontaining products for treatment of leg ulcers has been an important source for contact allergy to gum rosin, it might be one of the explanations behind the higher prevalence of allergy in the older group (Lindberg et al 2007).…”
Section: Screening and Patch Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%