2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time trend of exposure to the phthalate plasticizer substitute DINCH in Germany from 1999 to 2017: Biomonitoring data on young adults from the Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with these findings, we observed a negative time trend between 2014 and 2017 in maternal urinary concentration of several phthalate metabolites (DEHP, BBzP and DiBP), while maternal urinary concentrations of DINCH metabolites increased during this period. Positive time trends have been reported for DINCH metabolites in Sweden ( Gyllenhammar et al, 2017 ), Germany ( Kasper-Sonnenberg et al, 2019 ) and the USA ( Silva et al, 2013 ) and are consistent with the increase in use of this plasticizer reported in Europe ( European Chemicals Agency, 2013 ; HBM4EU, 2018 ). This, along with the higher urinary median concentrations observed at twelve months for DINCH metabolites in our cohort, highlights the need of detailed investigations to warrant its safety.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with these findings, we observed a negative time trend between 2014 and 2017 in maternal urinary concentration of several phthalate metabolites (DEHP, BBzP and DiBP), while maternal urinary concentrations of DINCH metabolites increased during this period. Positive time trends have been reported for DINCH metabolites in Sweden ( Gyllenhammar et al, 2017 ), Germany ( Kasper-Sonnenberg et al, 2019 ) and the USA ( Silva et al, 2013 ) and are consistent with the increase in use of this plasticizer reported in Europe ( European Chemicals Agency, 2013 ; HBM4EU, 2018 ). This, along with the higher urinary median concentrations observed at twelve months for DINCH metabolites in our cohort, highlights the need of detailed investigations to warrant its safety.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, newer phthalates such as bis(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP) and phthalate's substitutes (1,2-Cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester (DINCH)) have recently been marketed. DINCH, mainly used to produce plastics for toys, medical devices and food contact materials was introduced in the European market in 2002 ( Kasper-Sonnenberg et al, 2019 ). Positive temporal trends, suggesting an increase in exposure over time, have been reported for the DINCH metabolites in Sweden ( Gyllenhammar et al, 2017 ) and Germany ( Kasper-Sonnenberg et al, 2019 ), however, to date, no data regarding DINCH exposure in the French general population is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the concentrations of MINCH metabolites, OH-MINCH, cx-MINCH and oxo-MINCH, increased over the years and were detected to be 2.09, 0.86 and 1.81 μg/L, respectively in urine samples of the German Environmental Specimen Bank (Schütze et al, 2014). Moreover, several other studies have also detected DINCH metabolites in urine samples (Fromme et al, 2016;Kasper-Sonnenberg et al, 2019;Mínguez-Alarc on et al, 2016;Ramos et al, 2016;Schwedler et al, 2020;Urbancova et al, 2019). The tolerable daily intake is estimated to be 1 mg/kg bw/day based on the rat data (EFSA, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the concentrations of cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monoisononyl ester (MINCH) metabolites, OH-MINCH, cx-MINCH and oxo-MINCH, increased over the years and were detected to be 2.09, 0.86 and 1.81 μg/L, respectively in urine samples of the German Specimen Bank (Schütze et al, 2014). Moreover, several other studies have also detected DINCH metabolites in urine samples (Fromme et al, 2016;Kasper-Sonnenberg et al, 2019;Mínguez-Alarcón et al, 2016;Ramos et al, 2016;Schwedler et al, 2020;Urbancova et al, 2019). The tolerable daily intake is estimated to be 1 mg/kg bw/day based on the rat data (EFSA, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%