2021
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐traveling seeds reveal that plant regeneration and growth traits are responding to climate change

Abstract: Studies assessing the biological impacts of climate change typically rely on longterm, historic data to measure trait responses to climate through time. Here, we overcame the problem of absent historical data by using resurrected seeds to capture historic plant-trait data for a number of plant regeneration and growth traits. We collected seed and seedling trait measurements from resurrected historic seeds and compared these with modern seed and seedling traits collected from the same species in the same geogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For both species, seedling survival declined with decreasing water availability in line with results from other studies (Everingham et al, 2021 ; Harrison & LaForgia, 2019 ; Hovenden et al, 2008 ). Surviving seedlings of V. alpina showed a higher investment in belowground biomass at low water availability in line with our prediction (P3) and other studies (Harrison & LaForgia, 2019 ; Larson et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both species, seedling survival declined with decreasing water availability in line with results from other studies (Everingham et al, 2021 ; Harrison & LaForgia, 2019 ; Hovenden et al, 2008 ). Surviving seedlings of V. alpina showed a higher investment in belowground biomass at low water availability in line with our prediction (P3) and other studies (Harrison & LaForgia, 2019 ; Larson et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It could also indicate a potentially non‐linear trend along the precipitation gradient where other factors than pure precipitation amount might influence the tolerance to drought. Mean annual precipitation has been found to be less important for changes in germination and seedling traits, while climatic effects such as the duration of heatwaves and dry spells, or the range of precipitation were found to be more important (Everingham et al, 2021 ; Orsenigo et al, 2014 ). In our study system, the variation in precipitation is highest in the wettest end of the gradient (Gya, 2022 ), which could mean that the high variation in precipitation in the wettest sites could also increase the number of drought events for the wettest populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful method to test for recent evolution is the resurrection approach in which ancestors raised from stored seeds (e.g. from seed banks) are compared in common garden experiments to newly sampled descendants from the same populations (Franks et al ., 2007, 2018; Franks & Weis, 2008; Orsini et al ., 2013; Merilä & Hendry, 2014; Everingham et al ., 2021; Rauschkolb et al ., 2022). On its own, the resurrection approach only reveals whether evolutionary changes occurred; it cannot answer to which degree these resulted from natural selection, genetic drift, immigration of new genotypes or mutations (Niklas, 1997; Leinonen et al ., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further issue with seed banks is that the material is in stasis, offering a snapshot of the genetic diversity of a population at the time of collecting. While this is helpful for resurrection studies (e.g., [74]) it means that material is no longer evolving. Living collections have a similar problem; while their plants can adapt and evolve, it is to conditions often outside their native range.…”
Section: Geographic and Taxonomic Biases In Collectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%