Time Tracking of Standard Ultrasound Examinations in Pediatric Hospitals and Pediatric Medical Practices – A Multicenter Study by the Pediatric Section of the German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM)

Abstract

Purpose Ultrasonography is the primary imaging modality in pediatrics but still lacks sufficient reimbursement in Germany. In this multicenter study, national data for the duration of standard ultrasound in pediatrics were systematically documented in order to specify the actual time required. Materials and Methods N = 10 hospitals (N = 5 university hospitals, N = 5 non-university hospitals) and N = 3 medical practices in Germany recorded the entire process of an ultrasound examination in a special protocol developed by the Pediatric Section of the DEGUM. The duration of each of seven single steps during ultrasonography (from data input to final discussion of the results) of different organ systems was logged. Results In total, N = 2118 examinations from different organ systems were recorded. N = 10 organ systems were examined frequently (> 30 times). The total duration of an ultrasound examination was statistically significantly longer in hospitals compared to medical practices (median (IQR) 27 min. (18–38) vs. 12 min. (9–17), p < 0.001). The “hands-on” patient time was approximately one half of the total required time in both settings (49.9 % vs. 48.9 %). Ultrasonography of the abdomen and brain lasted longer in university hospitals than in non-university hospitals (p < 0.001, and p = 0.04, respectively). Cooperation and age did not uniformly correlate with the total duration. Conclusion This study provides novel comprehensive national data for the duration of standardized ultrasound examinations of children and adolescents in Germany. These data are essential for a further evaluation of the economic costs and should support better remuneration in the future.

Multispectral optoacoustic tomography for non-invasive disease phenotyping in pediatric spinal muscular atrophy patients

“…In contrast to other imaging modalities, MSOT has short scanning times comparable to standard ultrasound investigations [48] , does not require ionizing radiation and produces quantitative measures. In turn, these modalities currently have limited penetration depths of approximately 2.5 cm from skin surface [35] .…”

Muscle Sonography in Inclusion Body Myositis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 944 Measurements

“…Finally, the development of international standard operating procedures, e.g., as developed for measures of disease activity in myositis by iMACS [ 58 ], would equalize the imaging evaluation and provide the basis for longitudinal studies. Advances in artificial intelligence will further facilitate US as a useful diagnostic and follow-up/longitudinal technique [ 59 ], which will foster its use in clinical trials [ 60 ].…”

Hybrid reflected‐ultrasound computed tomography versus B‐mode‐ultrasound for muscle scoring in spinal muscular atrophy

“…The ability of handheld real-time image acquisition with high spatial resolution of tissue echogenicity made ultrasound (US) one of the most valuable tools in medical imaging-especially in pediatric medicine. 1 However, upcoming novel imaging methods such as optoacoustic imaging (OAI) provide potentially more specific and quantitative information regarding tissues composition with quantitative measurements. These light-and sound-based technologies use reflected pressure waves from endogenous absorbers to detect and quantify tissue components.…”