2018
DOI: 10.1071/ah16275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to wait: a systematic review of strategies that affect out-patient waiting times

Abstract: Objective Out-patient waiting times pose a significant challenge for public patients in need of specialist evaluation and intervention. The aim of the present study was to identify and categorise effective strategies to reduce waiting times for specialist out-patient services with a focus on the Australian healthcare system. Methods A systematic review of major health databases was conducted using the key terms 'outpatient*' AND 'waiting time', 'process*' AND 'improvement in outpatient clinics'. Identified art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors other than capacity, such as patient logistics, complex booking processes, and poor use of resources, might also influence waiting. [15][16][17][18][19][20] There is reason to believe that the policies used for patient appointment allocation in secondary healthcare influence waiting times more than previously assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors other than capacity, such as patient logistics, complex booking processes, and poor use of resources, might also influence waiting. [15][16][17][18][19][20] There is reason to believe that the policies used for patient appointment allocation in secondary healthcare influence waiting times more than previously assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors may contribute to increased wait times, such as high volumes of incoming referrals, referral management and acceptance parameters, triage and scheduling procedures and prioritisation based on severity. 21 The importance of timely management for this cohort cannot be overestimated, where delays in management may result in patients suffering from psychological and social complications arising from their condition. For families experiencing disadvantage, the need for timely and low-cost care in the public setting is important to ensure that all children receive quality care and that socio-economic disparities do not impact child outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the most significant obstacle in the provision of timely management for constipation, a relatively low morbidity chronic condition, is wait time. Several factors may contribute to increased wait times, such as high volumes of incoming referrals, referral management and acceptance parameters, triage and scheduling procedures and prioritisation based on severity …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In large settings, such as hospitals, implementation of quality improvement initiatives are labour‐intensive and likely to be influenced by economic, social, and hospital policy‐driven barriers. There are usually several strategies that may be applied to improve the delivery of care and achieve better patient outcomes . As shown in this study, one of the first steps is an audit of current practice and process maps to identify areas where potential quality improvement initiatives can be applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is particularly important for common low‐morbidity childhood conditions such as wetting, where access to alarm therapy in the community is challenging. The large number of children referred to tertiary care has been suggested to result in longer waiting times, which may lead to deterioration in both symptoms and QoL . Existing methods for managing access and triage to outpatient services may lead to inequities in service delivery, inefficiencies, and divert resources from community‐based care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%