2016
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

44
1,288
12
22

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,678 publications
(1,366 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
44
1,288
12
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is indicated for the treatment of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke(Goyal et al., 2016), and the time to administer mechanical thrombectomy is a very important factor for good clinical outcome (Saver et al., 2016). MT is offered only in comprehensive stroke centers (CSC), as an endovascular team is required for the procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is indicated for the treatment of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke(Goyal et al., 2016), and the time to administer mechanical thrombectomy is a very important factor for good clinical outcome (Saver et al., 2016). MT is offered only in comprehensive stroke centers (CSC), as an endovascular team is required for the procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of functional independence was 64% with reperfusion at 3 hours and 46% with reperfusion at 8 hours. 26 As in our illustrative case, and in cases with proximal and distal tandem occlusions with patency of the carotid terminus and proximal intracranial segments on CTA, we prefer to perform a distal to proximal approach for revascularization. In this specific subset of patients, we believe that revascularization could be obtained faster from distal collaterals, and this might be associated with reduced time to recanalization and possibly a better outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Whereas in an analysis of the NINDS data the "line of no effect" was already reached after 2.5 h [2], later metaanalyses including studies with broader inclusion criteria suggested time windows of 4.5 h in 2010 [3] and of 5.1 h in 2014 [4]. A similar effect can be observed for thrombectomy that seemed to be efficacious until 6.3 h first [5] and later until 7.3 h [6]. It is important to understand that the decreasing therapy benefit (for the patient population within the trials) is inversely related to the average increase in infarct volume (and thus shrinking amount of tissue and function that can be saved by the therapy).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If significant, this data would suggest that actually delaying imaging would be beneficial (sic) but then we need to hurry up once imaging is done. Similarly, in the patient-level meta-analysis of the recent thrombectomy trials [6], there was no interaction of the time from symptom onset to the emergency room and therapy effect. In contrast, there was an absolute poor outcome (mRS 3-6) risk increase for every hour delay between emergency room and reperfusion of 13.7% (8.6 to 18.2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%