2020
DOI: 10.3384/diss.diva-164916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to Plan : How to support everyday planning in adolescents with intellectual disability

Abstract: Studies from the Swedish Institute for Disability Research No. 100 At the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Linköping University, research and doctoral studies are carried out within broad problem areas. Research is organized in interdisciplinary research environments and doctoral studies mainly in graduate schools. Jointly, they publish the series Linköping Studies in Arts and Science. This thesis comes from the Swedish Institute for Disability Research at the Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(342 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be argued that the effect could be attributed to the test-retest effect. It is however important to acknowledge that this effect is in fact a learning effect which is not always observable for this group of students (Palmqvist, 2020). Additionally, the test-retest effect cannot not explain the improvement of phonological awareness for the combined training.…”
Section: Improvement In All Groupsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It could be argued that the effect could be attributed to the test-retest effect. It is however important to acknowledge that this effect is in fact a learning effect which is not always observable for this group of students (Palmqvist, 2020). Additionally, the test-retest effect cannot not explain the improvement of phonological awareness for the combined training.…”
Section: Improvement In All Groupsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Scholars stated that all training groups performed significantly better on the transfer task than the controls; however, the training groups did not significantly differ from each other (Palmqvist, 2020). The implications of the findings concerning cognitive interventions and future Working Memory (WM) training studies are discussed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%