2021
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to Colonoscopy After Abnormal Stool-Based Screening and Risk for Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal time interval for diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal stoolbased colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test is uncertain. We examined the association between time to colonoscopy and CRC outcomes among individuals who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy after abnormal stool-based screening. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of veterans age 50 to 75 years with an abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) between 1999 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(75 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRC is also the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths [1] with a 5-year mortality rate of about 40% [2], which is also a great health burden in China [3,4]. Through the implementation of screening by serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and colonoscopy, increasing CRC patients could nowadays be diagnosed at an earlier stage before the formation of metastatic lesions [5,6], for whom surgical resection is the optimal treatment modality. However, a substantial proportion of patients still experience disease recurrence after the curative resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRC is also the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths [1] with a 5-year mortality rate of about 40% [2], which is also a great health burden in China [3,4]. Through the implementation of screening by serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and colonoscopy, increasing CRC patients could nowadays be diagnosed at an earlier stage before the formation of metastatic lesions [5,6], for whom surgical resection is the optimal treatment modality. However, a substantial proportion of patients still experience disease recurrence after the curative resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have similarly reported suboptimal follow-up of positive FIT, ranging from 18 to 57% in safety-net health systems [29][30][31]. This is especially concerning because delays in diagnostic colonoscopy increase risk of advanced adenoma, any CRC, and advanced-stage disease [32,33]. An ongoing challenge is that much of the literature is descriptive and focuses on patient characteristics associated with timely follow-up [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to patient preference and limited resources (6), FIT is a cornerstone for CRC screening in these settings. Among patients with an abnormal FIT result, a missed or delayed diagnostic colonoscopy increases CRC incidence and mortality (7)(8)(9)(10). Despite these concerns, the proportion of patients with an abnormal FIT result who complete a diagnostic colonoscopy rarely exceeds 50% in most safety-net systems and FQHCs (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%