2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-019-01069-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to benefit and the long-term persistence of new users of oral bisphosphonates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, a study of FLS in France reported a 1-year adherence rate of less than 50% among patients aged 70 years or older; 28 this may be owing to differences in study design. The 3-year adherence rate in an observational study of patients who did not receive FLS was 25%, 25 which is comparable to the rate in our study (26%). Naranjo et al observed that approximately 57% of patients adhered to treatment for 3 years, 26 similar to our findings (57.5%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, a study of FLS in France reported a 1-year adherence rate of less than 50% among patients aged 70 years or older; 28 this may be owing to differences in study design. The 3-year adherence rate in an observational study of patients who did not receive FLS was 25%, 25 which is comparable to the rate in our study (26%). Naranjo et al observed that approximately 57% of patients adhered to treatment for 3 years, 26 similar to our findings (57.5%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, in comparison with those who did not receive OWFLS, adherence was better in patients included in OWFLS (p ¼ 0.003, p < 0.0001, respectively). A large population-based study including 42,249 patients who did not receive FLS revealed that only 48% adhered to bisphosphonate treatment for 1 year, 25 which is similar to the 1-year adherence rate among patients who did not receive OWFLS in our study (51.9%). Naranjo et al discovered that the 1-year adherence rate for FLS recipients was 72%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There are few studies on adherence to osteoporosis treatment over 2 years, and none report on the FLS model. An observational study with a large sample showed that 25% of incident users of bisphosphonates continued taking treatment for up to 3 years and 14% for up to 5 years 24 . In the randomized SOS study, adherence at 3 years was 46% 25 , while in the SCOOP trial, adherence at 5 years was 26% 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few studies on adherence to osteoporosis treatment over 2 years, and none report on the FLS model. An observational study with a large sample showed that 25% of incident users of bisphosphonates continued taking treatment for up to 3 years and 14% for up to 5 years (24). In the randomized SOS study, adherence at 3 years was 46% (25), while in the SCOOP trial, adherence at 5 years was 26% (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%