2005
DOI: 10.1002/app.21648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time–temperature superposition principle applied to a kenaf‐fiber/high‐density polyethylene composite

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The time-temperature superposition principle was applied to the viscoelastic properties of a kenaffiber/high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composite, and its validity was tested. With a composite of 50% kenaf fibers, 48% HDPE, and 2% compatibilizer, frequency scans from a dynamic mechanical analyzer were performed in the range of 0.1-10 Hz at five different temperatures. Twelve-minute creep tests were also performed at the same temperatures. Creep data were modeled with a simple two-parameter power-law … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 7 demonstrates that the apparent activation energy of HDPE far below the melting temperature is about 78 kJ/mol, which is lower than the values provided in some studies grounded on the standard method of superposition of observations in dynamic tests: E a ¼ 110-140 (Zamfirova et al, 2002), E a ¼ 137 (Pegoretti et al, 2000), E a ¼ 150-170 (Mano et al, 2001), E a ¼ 174 (Djokovic et al, 2000), and E a ¼ 207 kJ/mol (Tajvidi et al, 2005), but agrees well with the activation energies E a ¼ 50-140 (Stadler et al, 2005), E a ¼ 65-80 (Boiko et al, 1995), E a ¼ 79-106 (Matsuo et al, 1988), and E a ¼ 89 kJ/mol (Ohta and Yasuda, 1994). The fact that the apparent activation energy of HDPE in the solid state exceeds that of HDPE melt by twice [in the latter case, the activation energy belongs to the interval between 27 and 32 kJ/mol (Bin Wadud and Baird, 2000)] appears to be natural, whereas rather high values of the activation energies (close to the activation energies for thermal degradation of this polymer [E a ¼ 210-270 (Sinfronio et al, 2005) and E a ¼ 260-290 kJ/mol (Marazzato et al, 2007)] ''shows that the physical significance of E a .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Fig. 7 demonstrates that the apparent activation energy of HDPE far below the melting temperature is about 78 kJ/mol, which is lower than the values provided in some studies grounded on the standard method of superposition of observations in dynamic tests: E a ¼ 110-140 (Zamfirova et al, 2002), E a ¼ 137 (Pegoretti et al, 2000), E a ¼ 150-170 (Mano et al, 2001), E a ¼ 174 (Djokovic et al, 2000), and E a ¼ 207 kJ/mol (Tajvidi et al, 2005), but agrees well with the activation energies E a ¼ 50-140 (Stadler et al, 2005), E a ¼ 65-80 (Boiko et al, 1995), E a ¼ 79-106 (Matsuo et al, 1988), and E a ¼ 89 kJ/mol (Ohta and Yasuda, 1994). The fact that the apparent activation energy of HDPE in the solid state exceeds that of HDPE melt by twice [in the latter case, the activation energy belongs to the interval between 27 and 32 kJ/mol (Bin Wadud and Baird, 2000)] appears to be natural, whereas rather high values of the activation energies (close to the activation energies for thermal degradation of this polymer [E a ¼ 210-270 (Sinfronio et al, 2005) and E a ¼ 260-290 kJ/mol (Marazzato et al, 2007)] ''shows that the physical significance of E a .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…They found that the horizontal superposition was not satisfactory and two-dimensional superposition method was somewhat preferable. Comparing the results of this study with that of Tajvidi et al (2005), it can be suggested that the equivalency between stress level and time may be more than the equivalency between temperature and time. …”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Tajvidi et al (2005) investigated the time temperature response of kenaf-fiber/high density polyethylene composites. Short duration (12 min) creep tests were performed at five different temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTS is valid when temperature dependence of horizontal shift factors are in the form of either Williams-Landel and Ferry (WLF) [50] or Arrhenius [51] Equations, the creep tests temperature range should be below material degradation, and there should be no residual curing of the resin occurring during the creep tests. In addition, for crystalline and semi-crystalline materials, the deformation should be kept in the linear viscoelastic range by applying low strains [52].…”
Section: Service Life Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%