2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00362-006-0040-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time series with discrete semistable marginals

Abstract: Autoregressive process, Moving average process, Stationarity, Probability generating functions, Discrete semistable distribution,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next proposition states that equation ( 4) is a sufficient condition for the existence of stationary INAR (1) processes. For a proof see for example Bouzar and Jayakumar (2008) or, in a more general setting, Aly and Bouzar (1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next proposition states that equation ( 4) is a sufficient condition for the existence of stationary INAR (1) processes. For a proof see for example Bouzar and Jayakumar (2008) or, in a more general setting, Aly and Bouzar (1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While theoretical properties of INAR models with Poisson innovations have been extensively studied in the literature (see, for instance, Freeland and McCabe 2004a;, and the references therein), relatively few contributions discuss the development of methods for INAR models with innovations distributed differently from the Poisson. Among the others, Bouzar and Jayakumar (2008) propose INAR models with discrete semistable marginals and related distributions, Weiß (2013) works on models for counts showing underdispersion, Weiß et al (2016) introduce a test for departures from Poissonity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this connection, we note that for both the INAR and PAR models, a typical example of distributional law involves the Poisson distribution. Recently, however, there have been proposed several alternatives or more general specifications; see, for instance, Jazi et al (), Bouzar & Jayakumar (), Bourguinon & Vasconcellos (), Goncalves et al (), Schweer & Weiss (), Zhu () and Fokianos (). One major aspect that might lead to non‐Poisson specifications is (marginal or conditional) overdispersion or underdispersion of the data at hand, and it is conceivable to expect that such a feature might manifest itself only beyond a certain point in time, thus signalling a structural change in the observations that cannot be accommodated by a potential change in the parameters as long as the (equidispersed) Poisson law remains in place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%