2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Series of Potential US Wildland Fire Smoke Exposures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this screening distance, we are not necessarily using a plume's full extent, but rather following along the plume centerline for a distance coinciding with surface smoke concentrations decaying below a preset value. While Vargo [87] avoided the same shortcoming of using the HMS plumes for estimating exposure by adding aerosol optical depth information to the analysis to add smoke concentration information, such an approach is not amenable for scenario-based projection aspects of the current study, where the use of the gaussian plume model allows flexibility in adjusting the screening distance based on simulated changes in fuel conditions [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this screening distance, we are not necessarily using a plume's full extent, but rather following along the plume centerline for a distance coinciding with surface smoke concentrations decaying below a preset value. While Vargo [87] avoided the same shortcoming of using the HMS plumes for estimating exposure by adding aerosol optical depth information to the analysis to add smoke concentration information, such an approach is not amenable for scenario-based projection aspects of the current study, where the use of the gaussian plume model allows flexibility in adjusting the screening distance based on simulated changes in fuel conditions [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, wildfire smoke is defined based on satellite imagery, therefore exposure misclassification is possible in this context since it may also capture smoke higher in the atmosphere. Nonetheless, validation of the HMS smoke product with ground-level monitors has been shown correlation with PM 2.5 concentrations [43]. Additionally, we only focused on cumulative mortality as the outcome of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates were revised and modified by trained analysts to improve accuracy. Aerosol Optical Depth information was collected from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite Aerosol and Smoke Product and smoke plumes were categorized by NOAA's Office of Satellite and Product Operations as light, medium, or heavy categories, corresponding to PM 2.5 concentrations of 0-10, 10-21, and 22+ µg m 3 , respectively [43]. Satellite imagery for the border region was obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Worldview visualization tool [44].…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable smoke alarm is essential for preventing fire-related losses. Rapidly spreading wildfires, exacerbated by climate change, can have far-reaching consequences on human communities, ecosystems, and economies, if not detected or extinguished quickly [ 1 , 2 ]. Smoke and flame detection are both applicable to wildfire monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%