2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10096-010-0004-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time series analysis (orbital cycles) of the uppermost Cenomanian-Lower Turonian sequence on the southern Tethyan margin using foraminifera

Abstract: Time series analysis has been performed for the first time on the Cenomanian-Turonian sequence in Central Tunisia in order to shed light on its Milankovitch-like cyclicity. This analysis was applied to two foraminiferal genera: the biserial Heterohelix, an oxygen-minimum zone (OMZ) dweller, and the triserial Guembelitria, a eutrophic surface dweller. Average sedimentary rates and the duration of the oceanic anoxic event (OAE2) in each studied section were estimated. The fluctuations in abundance of these two o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the south, the Saharan shield was not an area of non-deposition as suggested by Zghal and ArnaudVanneau (2005), Chihaoui (2008), andBen Fadhel et al (2011), but rather it was covered during the early Albian transgression by the Foum El Argoub/Chennini transgressive sandstones and the Redouane/Zebbag platforms (Ben Youssef 1999; Ouaja et al 2004;Soua 2009;Bodin et al 2010), where the Knemiceras level (Ain El Guettar Formation) represents the equivalent of the mfs of the Allam black shale. Central Tunisia was covered by the carbonate platform of the Zebbag Formation.…”
Section: Distribution and Characteristics Of Organic-rich Stratamentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the south, the Saharan shield was not an area of non-deposition as suggested by Zghal and ArnaudVanneau (2005), Chihaoui (2008), andBen Fadhel et al (2011), but rather it was covered during the early Albian transgression by the Foum El Argoub/Chennini transgressive sandstones and the Redouane/Zebbag platforms (Ben Youssef 1999; Ouaja et al 2004;Soua 2009;Bodin et al 2010), where the Knemiceras level (Ain El Guettar Formation) represents the equivalent of the mfs of the Allam black shale. Central Tunisia was covered by the carbonate platform of the Zebbag Formation.…”
Section: Distribution and Characteristics Of Organic-rich Stratamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, no deposition of the anoxic C/T carbonate on uplifts and palaeohighs is recorded. During that time, subsidence led to the accumulation of more than 50 m of laminated black shales in a time span of about 0.4 million years in the Tunisian sections (Soua 2010a). In summary, this period testifies to the reduction of emerged areas inherited from the Early Cretaceous, and thus we note that: (1) to the west, the subsidence is controlled by a preferential NE-SW-faulting trend (Aurès basin-Kef) where maximum C/T subsidence is recorded;…”
Section: Molecular Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At small scale, as for the Bahloul Formation (which display 20 to 30 m) the shift from negative trends (Figures 2 and 4), interpreted as a shallowing upward sequence (e.g., Facies C and F) to a positive trend, interpreted as deepening upward sequence (e.g., Facies B and D) suggest that some significant change has affected the depositional system. The "shallowing upward" trend has been switched off through the major third order eustatic rise, linked to a change in the Milankovitch periodicity and in turn to climatic variation [13]. Alternatively, the switching from positive trend to negative trend, may be caused by a switching from a deepening upward sequence to a shallowing upward one and in turn the reverse effect has taken place and there is an abrupt resumption of shallower sediment deposition.…”
Section: Climate Stratigraphy Using Gamma-ray As Proxy Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main sequence (Bahloul formation) is typically controlled by the global relative sea-level rise causing the major latest Cenomanian transgression which in turn was interpreted as a combined phenomenon between a long-term sea-level rise and basin subsidence [1,11,12]. It must be understood that this sequence seems to be generated by enhanced plate tectonic activity and by the change in the Milankovitch frequency band (e.g., [13]) justifying climatic cycles which are detected in the sedimentary record ( Figure 2). The major rise in the Cenomanian sea level was interrupted by the five-third order relative sea-level falls [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%