2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21718-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Series Analysis of Rapid GNSS Measurements for Quasi-static and Dynamic Bridge Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some monitored parameters are highly sensitive to environmental and operational conditions, which can mask the changes caused by damage [35,36]. Moreover, the key question remains of whether the SHM system of long-span bridges can be optimised to detect localised damage using global monitored parameters such as displacement and modal frequencies of low-order vibration modes [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some monitored parameters are highly sensitive to environmental and operational conditions, which can mask the changes caused by damage [35,36]. Moreover, the key question remains of whether the SHM system of long-span bridges can be optimised to detect localised damage using global monitored parameters such as displacement and modal frequencies of low-order vibration modes [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Positioning System (GPS) double differencing (DD) is a well-established method for bridge displacement monitoring (Ashkenazi and Roberts 1997;Roberts et al 2020). High precision can be achieved for structure displacement monitoring as major GPS errors can be largely eliminated or significantly reduced through the DD method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the direct signals, reflected signals and diffracted signals of global positioning system (GPS) satellites reach the receiver antenna simultaneously, the interference will lead to an important error called the multipath error [1]. For carrier phase observations, the maximum error can be as 2 of 18 large as 1/4 the wavelength [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%