2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.71.044602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time sequence and time scale of intermediate mass fragment emission

Abstract: Matière Nucléaire NIMSemiperipheral collisions in the $^{124}$Sn+${64}Ni reaction at 35 MeV/nucleon were studied using the forward part of the Charged Heavy Ion Mass and Energy Resolving Array. Nearly completely determined ternary events involving projectilelike fragments (PLF), targetlike fragments (TLF), and intermediate mass fragments (IMF) were selected. A new method of studying the reaction mechanism, focusing on the analysis of the correlations between relative velocities in the IMF+PLF and IMF+TLF subsy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle-particle correlations [23][24][25], velocity correlations [26][27][28][29], fission fragment angular distributions [30], and Coulomb proximity affects [21,22,[31][32][33] have been used in attempts to extract information on the emission time of fragments. The proximity of the PLF and TLF to the midrapidity LCPs can be exploited to provide information on their emission time since particles emitted at early stages in the reaction will feel an increased Coulomb potential due to the increased proximity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle-particle correlations [23][24][25], velocity correlations [26][27][28][29], fission fragment angular distributions [30], and Coulomb proximity affects [21,22,[31][32][33] have been used in attempts to extract information on the emission time of fragments. The proximity of the PLF and TLF to the midrapidity LCPs can be exploited to provide information on their emission time since particles emitted at early stages in the reaction will feel an increased Coulomb potential due to the increased proximity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies the largest part of the reaction cross section corresponds to binary events, characterized by the presence in the exit channel of two heavy remnants, the quasiprojectile and the quasitarget. Together with these heavy remnants one observes LCPs and intermediate mass fragments (IMFs, with 3 Z 16) produced by their evaporative decay and possibly by midvelocity emissions (see, e.g., [16][17][18]). The transverse energy of LCPs was used to estimate the centrality of the collisions [16,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Heavy-Ion collisions at Fermi energies the production of Light Particles and Intermediate Mass Fragments (IMFs), here defined as fragments with atomic number Z ≥ 3, is due to different reaction mechanisms related to different time scales [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. This was seen in semi-peripheral collisions where coexistence of light IMFs emission from prompt neckfragmentation process [1, 2, 4-6, 9, 10], projectile-like fragments (PLF*) collinear massive break-up [3,5,7,8,13,14] and equilibrated PLF* binary fission-like emission [7,10,13,14] has been reported within the same range of large relative impact parameters. Thus, within a narrow range of initial kinematical nucleus-nucleus conditions of relative energy and angular momenta, the competition among different mechanisms having a large difference in the time scale, from prompt IMFs emissions (dozens of fm/c) to equilibrated decay (≫ 300f m/c), has been observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%