ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icc40277.2020.9149161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Sensitive Networking for 5G Fronthaul Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, TSN-Qbv is more effective when the traffic is scheduled. This has been experimentally validated in our previous work [7]. In the underload scenario, we notice the lowest values of latency in the case of Preemption, which always preempts the lower priority eMBB traffic and prioritizes the URLLC flows.…”
Section: B Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, TSN-Qbv is more effective when the traffic is scheduled. This has been experimentally validated in our previous work [7]. In the underload scenario, we notice the lowest values of latency in the case of Preemption, which always preempts the lower priority eMBB traffic and prioritizes the URLLC flows.…”
Section: B Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…By applying simulations it is demonstrated that contention of high priority traffic can be reduced and the frame delay jitter can be minimized. In [7], we evaluated the performance of Ethernet TSN networks based on IEEE 802.1Qbv and IEEE 802.1Qbu for carrying real fronthaul traffic and benchmarked it against Strict priority and Round Robin scheduling schemes.…”
Section: B Tsn For the Fronthaul-8021cm Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Real-time systems are explicitly considered [36]. A significant portion of the research has been focused on implementations as part of wireless 5G [37].…”
Section: Time Sensitive Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%