2014
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time scales of associating food and odor by predator communities in the field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The innate preference of inexperienced parasitoids for hostplus non-host caterpillar-damaged plants could be caused by a quantitative difference in emitted volatiles related to caterpillar feeding, as a result of unequal numbers of caterpillars on the two plant infestation types (Geervliet et al, 1998a). Only very few previous studies have shown that insects that can learn to associate cues with the presence of their host/food in the laboratory also accordingly show altered behaviour in (semi-)field situations (Lewis & Martin, 1990;Hare et al, 1997;Raine & Chittka, 2008;Zrelec et al, 2013;Janssen et al, 2014;Kruidhof et al, 2015). Quantitative differences could also have occurred because of changed emission rates of caterpillar-related volatile compounds due to co-infestation by phloem-feeding insects such as aphids (Rodriguez-Saona et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2013;Ponzio et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The innate preference of inexperienced parasitoids for hostplus non-host caterpillar-damaged plants could be caused by a quantitative difference in emitted volatiles related to caterpillar feeding, as a result of unequal numbers of caterpillars on the two plant infestation types (Geervliet et al, 1998a). Only very few previous studies have shown that insects that can learn to associate cues with the presence of their host/food in the laboratory also accordingly show altered behaviour in (semi-)field situations (Lewis & Martin, 1990;Hare et al, 1997;Raine & Chittka, 2008;Zrelec et al, 2013;Janssen et al, 2014;Kruidhof et al, 2015). Quantitative differences could also have occurred because of changed emission rates of caterpillar-related volatile compounds due to co-infestation by phloem-feeding insects such as aphids (Rodriguez-Saona et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2013;Ponzio et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new experience levelled out the preference for plants induced by only host caterpillars in the wind-tunnel experiment. Only very few previous studies have shown that insects that can learn to associate cues with the presence of their host/food in the laboratory also accordingly show altered behaviour in (semi-)field situations (Lewis & Martin, 1990;Hare et al, 1997;Raine & Chittka, 2008;Zrelec et al, 2013;Janssen et al, 2014;Kruidhof et al, 2015). Cotesia glomerata is well known for its ability to learn in the laboratory (Geervliet et al, 1998a,b;Bleeker et al, 2006;Smid et al, 2007;Kruidhof et al, 2012a,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the localisation of prey on novel host plants may not be easy because foraging efficiency may be compromised: the blends of volatiles produced by novel host plants in response to attack by the herbivore may not be recognised as cues by the natural enemy complex. Yet, selection for attraction of predators by volatiles can be rapid (Margolies et al., ) and predators can learn to respond to volatiles of novel host plants (Papaj & Lewis, ; Turlings et al., ; Vet et al., ; Drukker et al., ; Takabayashi et al., ; Janssen et al., ). Second, natural enemies may have difficulties in consuming prey on a novel host plant because herbivores use toxins from their host plants for their own protection (Smiley et al., ; Denno et al., ; Rank, ; Nishida, ; Singer et al., ,b; Zvereva & Rank, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as CPs, whose VOCs have been categorized into three distinct types, namely, cool-pungent, cool-sweet, and cool-fruity, respectively 29 . In addition, in this study we explored the importance of plastic experiences of exposure to mint odors on predators' attractivity, because we are aware that olfactory preference of herbivores' natural enemies can be elevated through associative experiences 30 . The natural enemies come to prefer VOCs released from the herbivore-infested host plant in some cases when they have previously experienced the conspecific herbivore prey on the conspecific host species with the same genotype 31,32 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%