2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-007-9219-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Scales in the Unstable Atmospheric Surface Layer

Abstract: Calculation of eddy covariances in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) requires separating the instantaneous signal into mean and fluctuating components. Since the ASL is not statistically stationary, an inherent ambiguity exists in defining the mean quantities. The present study compares four methods of calculating physically relevant time scales in the unstable ASL that may be used to remove the unsteady mean components of instantaneous time signals, in order to yield local turbulent fluxes that appear to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, the surface roughness is highly dependent on the time of year and playa condition, leading to estimates of aerodynamic roughness length z 0 or equivalent sand roughness k s , which can vary essentially between the smooth and transitionally rough regimes for different sets of experiments (Metzger & Holmes 2008). For instance, near-wall hot-wire measurements by Metzger in 2003(included in Metzger et al 2007) are characterized by k + s as high as 50, while sonic anemometer measurements further from the wall (e.g.…”
Section: Mean and Fluctuating Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, the surface roughness is highly dependent on the time of year and playa condition, leading to estimates of aerodynamic roughness length z 0 or equivalent sand roughness k s , which can vary essentially between the smooth and transitionally rough regimes for different sets of experiments (Metzger & Holmes 2008). For instance, near-wall hot-wire measurements by Metzger in 2003(included in Metzger et al 2007) are characterized by k + s as high as 50, while sonic anemometer measurements further from the wall (e.g.…”
Section: Mean and Fluctuating Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sonic anemometer used in this study was located 2.3 m above the ground. For more details about the SLTEST site, see Metzger and Holmes (2008). At the SLTEST site, 2 days met the selection criteria for our analysis: 11 July and 21 July 2002.…”
Section: Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the salt flat was ideally uniform for winds from the north (Metzger and Holmes 2008), the tower and transect had been installed near a raised parking area, on which stood several large instrument trailers (see McNaughton et al 2007, for a photograph of the set-up). Comparison of statistics from sonics along the transect (at z = 3 m) during northerly flow revealed an influence of these obstacles that could readily be detected at the 3-m sonic on the tower (viz.…”
Section: Measurements At Dugway Proving Groundsmentioning
confidence: 99%