2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2014.6943150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time scaled collision cone based trajectory optimization approach for reactive planning in dynamic environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 In the latter case, a simple cost function is generally used, for example, minimal distance to the goal. It is important to emphasize that there is a rich literature in collision avoidance approaches; 6,7,[17][18][19][20] however, all of them provide only collision-free guarantee where motion safety is not considered at all. Motion safety requires guaranteeing that collision will never occur.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 In the latter case, a simple cost function is generally used, for example, minimal distance to the goal. It is important to emphasize that there is a rich literature in collision avoidance approaches; 6,7,[17][18][19][20] however, all of them provide only collision-free guarantee where motion safety is not considered at all. Motion safety requires guaranteeing that collision will never occur.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we show that velocity optimization (13a)-(13f) can be reformulated to a convex quadratic programming (QP) problem. We start with the convexification of TSCC constraints (10) or (12) and then subsequently show that its intersection space with velocity and acceleration bounds can be described in terms of linear inequalities. For the ease of exposition, we introduce the following change of variables [23].ṡ…”
Section: Simplification Of Velocity Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to show the robustness of our approach over different trajectory generators, we combine our RL based approach with Bernstein curves [7] for trajectory generation and with the ROS Navigation Stack, in which navigation carried out in two levels where Informed RRT* [6] behaves as the global planner and Timed Elastic Band (TEB) [21] performs the role of the trajectory generator. We show results both without (naive) and with RL, to show that an informed approach using RL is more effective than an uninformed or naive path planner.…”
Section: Goal Based Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using RL in an episodic manner, the result of each failure is propagated back to earlier states over multiple episodes, making the predictions of /submit/2514950/addfilesfuture failures more likely in the earlier stages once the learning converges. Analysis shows significant reduction in SLAM failures when the learned Q values are used to filter actions in trajectories generated by routine methods such as sampling based planners [13] or trajectory optimization routines [7] [21]. Qualitative and quantitative analysis and comparisons with supervised learning approaches, 3D point overlap maximization techniques, and predicting Localization Quality estimates, described in [16], showcase the superior performance of the proposed method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%