1943
DOI: 10.1037/h0053539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time sampling in studies of social behavior: a critical review of techniques and results with research suggestions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these informal observations, the conversational behaviors of questioning, positive feedback, and time talked were reliably specified using the following procedure. (Arrington, 1943), new observers were employed each time the written behavioral definition was changed. The time-talked measure was recorded by counting the cumulative number of seconds spoken by each of the conversants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these informal observations, the conversational behaviors of questioning, positive feedback, and time talked were reliably specified using the following procedure. (Arrington, 1943), new observers were employed each time the written behavioral definition was changed. The time-talked measure was recorded by counting the cumulative number of seconds spoken by each of the conversants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one of the earliest demands on applied researchers in behavior analysis was for accurate and reliable description and observation of the dependent variable (e.g., Heyns & Lippitt, 1954). The classic literature of observational technology (e.g., Arrington, 1943;Bijou, Peterson, & Ault, 1968;Rosenthal & Rosnow, 1969;Webb, Campbell, Schwartz, & Sechrist, 1966;Weick, 1968) was joined in later years by a new literature, concerned with problems of dependent variable observation such as observer reactivity (e.g., Hanley, 1970;Romanczyk, Kent, Diament, & O'Leary, 1973), observer bias (e.g., McNamara & MacDonough, 1972; O'Leary, Kent, & Kanowitz, 1975), observer drift (e.g., Reid, 1970), observational complexity (e.g., Kazdin, 1977a) and 477 1982, 15) [477][478][479][480][481][482][483][484][485][486][487][488][489][490][491][492] NUMBER 4 (WINTER 1982) various sources of inflation of observer reliability estimates (e.g., Hartmann, 1977). The number of articles in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) that contain reliability estimates of the dependent variable have steadily increased in recent years (Hayes, Rincover, & Solnick, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ecologically valid descriptive data complement more widely used behavior rating scales to evaluate the impact of intervention programming on children's aggressive behavior. While observation data make an undeniable contribution to evaluation findings, particularly for programs of behavior change, the validity and reliability of observation data have been debated for more than half a century (Arrington, 1943;Johnson and Bolstad, 1973). This paper discusses challenges encountered in a multisite, multimethod evaluation of an intervention program to reduce aggressive behavior in elementary schools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%