1957
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.108.502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Reversal in Nuclear Interactions

Abstract: 502LETTERS TO THE EDITOR for a 7 ray of energy (990±30) Mev. The error is statistical. We estimate systematic errors to be about 30% primarily arising from uncertainty about the bremsstrahlung spectrum close to the upper end. The beam integration was carried out using a total absorption ion chamber. 2 Measurements of the photoproduction of K mesons by 1-Bev 7 rays have been reported previously by Donoho and Walker at the California Institute of Technology. 3 Their measurements together with ours are plotted in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To check experimentally the detailed balance conditions it is necessary to deal with a complex reaction that can be formally equilibrated without detailed balance. If not, then one tests not the detailed balance but just the equilibrium condition as it was mentioned in [25].…”
Section: A Bit Of Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check experimentally the detailed balance conditions it is necessary to deal with a complex reaction that can be formally equilibrated without detailed balance. If not, then one tests not the detailed balance but just the equilibrium condition as it was mentioned in [25].…”
Section: A Bit Of Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 We have compared e and P for hydrogen, lithium, beryllium, and aluminum, chosen for their high spin-tomass ratios, since a failure of e=P in spin-zero nuclei would necessarily violate parity conservation. 5 No measurements of P have previously been performed for these elements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been estimated that in strong interactions, present experimental data set an upper limit of 10-20% to the relative strength of forces which are noninvariant with respect to time reversal. 7 We have compared e and P for hydrogen, lithium, beryllium, and aluminum, chosen for their high spin-tomass ratios, since a failure of e=P in spin-zero nuclei would necessarily violate parity conservation. 5 No measurements of P have previously been performed for these elements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%