2011
DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2010.2048941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Reversal Approach to the Stereophonic Acoustic Echo Cancellation Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach, instead of driving the loudspeakers with signals xi(k), distorted signalsxi(k) are used as the input of the acoustic system and the adaptive filters. The two major branches of preprocessing techniques are nonlinear [2], [4], [3], [23] and time-variant [24], [25], [26], [27] preprocessing, which are both able to effectively decorrelate the system excitation. Introduced distortions, however, reduce the perceptual quality of the displayed signals which gives rise to research in psychoacoustically motivated [28], [29] decorrelation techniques.…”
Section: A Decorrelation Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, instead of driving the loudspeakers with signals xi(k), distorted signalsxi(k) are used as the input of the acoustic system and the adaptive filters. The two major branches of preprocessing techniques are nonlinear [2], [4], [3], [23] and time-variant [24], [25], [26], [27] preprocessing, which are both able to effectively decorrelate the system excitation. Introduced distortions, however, reduce the perceptual quality of the displayed signals which gives rise to research in psychoacoustically motivated [28], [29] decorrelation techniques.…”
Section: A Decorrelation Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely used solution for reducing the effect of this problem is the acoustic feedback cancellation (AFC) and acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) algorithms which identify the acoustic feedback/echo paths by means of an adaptive filter in a system identification configuration, see e.g., [4]- [10]. Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Acoustic Feedback/echo Cancellation In Multiple-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different ways to model these variations, see e.g., [14]. In this work, we use a simple random walk model given by (5) for the th feedback/echo path, where is a zeromean Gaussian stochastic sequence with covariance (6) In the time domain, the feedback/echo path variation vector is (7) The correlation matrix of the th and th feedback/echo path variation is defined as (8) The adaptively estimated feedback/echo path of order is expressed by (9) and the estimation error vector which expresses the difference between the true and estimated feedback/echo path is (10) with a frequency response given by (11) In the analysis, we consider the loudspeaker signal as a deterministic zero-mean signal, because it is measurable and thereby known with certainty. However, our results remain valid, even if the loudspeaker signal is considered as a realization of a stochastic process; the same approach is applied and explained in details in [27].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MAEC may be seen as a straightforward generalization of the monophonic acoustic echo cancellation (AEC), but it entails more problems to tackle, such as nonuniqueness and slow convergence due to inter-channel correlation, and the poor ability to react to changes in the environmental conditions [5]. Such issues have roused remarkable interest over the years [6]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%