1999
DOI: 10.1021/la980815+
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Resolved Surface Rearrangements of Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-block-isoprene) in Response to Environmental Changes

Abstract: The hydrophilic−hydrophobic diblock copolymer (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, HEMA)41-block-(isoprene)84 was synthesized by anionic living polymerization using a protection technique for the hydroxyl group of HEMA. The surface structures of the block copolymer film under dry and wet conditions were analyzed by transmission electron microscopic observation and contact angle and angle-dependent X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic measurements. The top surfaces of the films cast from DMF/THF and THF/methanol are cove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This responsive behavior is similar to that exhibited by surfaces modified with grafted amphiphilic block copolymer molecules upon exposure to solvents or temperature. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Micelles offer additional advantages for surface modification because they are individual nanoscale entities that can be readily coated over a wide range of substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This responsive behavior is similar to that exhibited by surfaces modified with grafted amphiphilic block copolymer molecules upon exposure to solvents or temperature. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Micelles offer additional advantages for surface modification because they are individual nanoscale entities that can be readily coated over a wide range of substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sand in the treated and nontreated pots was saturated with water (via wetting from the base of the pot to simulate field drip irrigation several cm below the polymer) and the weight of the pots was monitored over time to determine soil water evaporation ( Figure 6). Figure 6 shows that soil water evaporation was reduced in the polymer-treated sand, even at a low polymer loading of just 48 g m 22 . For comparison, sprayable biopolymer-derived mulches described previously use significantly higher loadings of the active solids (>300 g m 22 ).…”
Section: Assessment Of Pdms(50)-peg(50) Performance As a Switchable Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows that soil water evaporation was reduced in the polymer-treated sand, even at a low polymer loading of just 48 g m 22 . For comparison, sprayable biopolymer-derived mulches described previously use significantly higher loadings of the active solids (>300 g m 22 ). [51][52][53][54] The results further show that soil water evaporation from the polymer-treated sand decreased by 76 6 7.7% compared to the control at 20 8C (close to the melting temperature of the polymer), while soil water evaporation decreased by 66 6 6.6% above the melting temperature of the polymer.…”
Section: Assessment Of Pdms(50)-peg(50) Performance As a Switchable Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations