1995
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00985-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐resolved surface charge change on the cytoplasmic side of bacteriorhodopsin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that in this fraction fluorescein bound in position 79 is oriented toward the hydrophilic cluster of the inner gate attracting water molecules to the cytoplasmic surface (6) and that positively charged residues, such as Arg-268, locally increase the iodide concentration, leading to an apparent higher quenching compared with the lower bulk I Ϫ concentrations. This effect may also be transient, because transient surface changes (in addition to the discussed helix tilt) are known to occur at the cytoplasmic surface of both bR (38) and visual rhodopsin (39) upon light activation. For instance, a conformational change of the EF-Loop at the cytoplasmic surface of bR was correlated with surface charge changes (16,38).…”
Section: Iafmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We speculate that in this fraction fluorescein bound in position 79 is oriented toward the hydrophilic cluster of the inner gate attracting water molecules to the cytoplasmic surface (6) and that positively charged residues, such as Arg-268, locally increase the iodide concentration, leading to an apparent higher quenching compared with the lower bulk I Ϫ concentrations. This effect may also be transient, because transient surface changes (in addition to the discussed helix tilt) are known to occur at the cytoplasmic surface of both bR (38) and visual rhodopsin (39) upon light activation. For instance, a conformational change of the EF-Loop at the cytoplasmic surface of bR was correlated with surface charge changes (16,38).…”
Section: Iafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect may also be transient, because transient surface changes (in addition to the discussed helix tilt) are known to occur at the cytoplasmic surface of both bR (38) and visual rhodopsin (39) upon light activation. For instance, a conformational change of the EF-Loop at the cytoplasmic surface of bR was correlated with surface charge changes (16,38). Because conformational heterogeneity was not observed at pH 7.4, a structural pH-dependent rearrangement of helix B below pH 7 must occur that affects the region of the inner gate.…”
Section: Iafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a switch between two different conformations of the third cytoplasmic loop connecting helix E and F in bR was observed that was triggered by a change in surface potential [26]. Since helix F (helix F in bR corresponds to TM6 in visual rhodopsin) is known to move in the second part of the bR photocycle and in the same time range a transient surface potential change was observed [55], it was proposed that the electrostatically triggered loop conformational change facilitates the movement of helix F [26]. In visual rhodopsin, loop dynamics and conformational changes were shown to correlate with the different photo-intermediates states and the interaction of affiliated proteins involved in signal transduction [26, 29, 59, 70, 72, 73, 88, 97].…”
Section: Experimental Approaches To Gain Unique Insight Into Rhodomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with the previous observations by Sternberg et al (1992Sternberg et al ( , 1993 showing that 4 M NaCl is essential for the formation of the two-dimensional array of bacteriorhodopsin trimer together with lipids from the purple membrane as studied froin reconstituted bilayers. It is also possible that the lowered surface pH in the absence of cations on the cytoplasmic side (Alexiev et al, 1994) results in electrostatic repulsion between bacteriorhodopsin and lipids. Accordingly, increased mobility at the C-terminal residues and head group of lipids is caused by electrostatic repulsion among charged species without salts.…”
Section: Temperature-dependent Change In Organization Of Membrane Lipmentioning
confidence: 99%