Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Large Scale Applications and Radiation Hardness of Semiconductor Detectors — PoS 2010
DOI: 10.22323/1.098.0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time resolved studies of Single Event Upset in optical data receiver for the ATLAS pixel detector

Abstract: A multichannel optical transceiver (optoboard) housing a PiN array coupled to a BPM signal decoding ASIC, was exposed to a proton beam of 24 GeV/c momentum. The 40 MHz clock and 40 Mbit/s data supplied to the optoboard were restored directly on the board and then in addition transmitted back to the counting room for online checking of consistency. In the case of a data bit error or a missing clock transition, indicating an occurrence of a SEU, a sequence of time aligned data bits along with the corresponding c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident from the decomposition of the total SEU rate into D, C and B contributions ( Table 1, Figure 2), that the type-D events clearly dominate the SEU rate for all optical power settings with 79% probability of occurrence, whereas for type-C and -B events a relative contribution of nearly 10% each was observed. This is almost the same result we obtained from 2009 measurement [2], which was limited by 110 μA maximum input photocurrent. The newly measured SEU cross-section is presented in Figure 3.…”
Section: Single-event-upset Rate and Cross-sectionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is evident from the decomposition of the total SEU rate into D, C and B contributions ( Table 1, Figure 2), that the type-D events clearly dominate the SEU rate for all optical power settings with 79% probability of occurrence, whereas for type-C and -B events a relative contribution of nearly 10% each was observed. This is almost the same result we obtained from 2009 measurement [2], which was limited by 110 μA maximum input photocurrent. The newly measured SEU cross-section is presented in Figure 3.…”
Section: Single-event-upset Rate and Cross-sectionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A scaling factor of 8, derived in section 6.5, has been applied. A comparison with our earlier SEU cross-section measurements reveals good agreement at 300 µA [3], at 100 µA [2] the present result is lower by a factor 3 and at 500 µA [3] higher by a factor 5.…”
Section: Single-event-upset Rate and Cross-sectionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations