“…All implementations of anti-Brownian traps can be distilled to two essential aspects of the closed-loop feedback: first, real-time tracking provides the location of a particle relative to the target position and may be determined using fluorescence , or bright- or dark-field imaging ,, in combination with either camera-based tracking − or timed movement of the excitation beam and one or more point detectors. ,,− Second, a feedback force must be quickly applied to move the particle back toward the target, which may be implemented using electric fields to induce electrophoresis or electroosmosis, − thermal gradients to induce thermophoresis, optical forces, or differential pressure to induce hydrodynamic flow . These steps must be implemented quickly enough to overcome the diffusive motion of the particle, and significant recent progress has been made toward optimizing this control loop to enable trapping of individual small organic fluorophores. , Trap implementations that utilize either intrinsic or label-based fluorescence to track emissive particles have been employed to characterize time-varying photophysical states, − molecular dynamics and kinetics, − and more. − However, the trapping duration and associated data collection in anti-Brownian traps are typically limited by photobleaching or blinking because dark particles cannot be tracked and are quickly lost. Bechhoefer and co-workers successfully demonstrated trapping of nonfluorescent particles using a dark-field signal, but the unfavorable scaling of scattering intensity with particle size limits this approach to relatively large nanoscale objects (>100 nm) with large scattering cross sections.…”