2021
DOI: 10.1115/1.4051711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Resolved Measurements of the Unsteady Boundary Layer in an Annular Low-Pressure Turbine Configuration With Perturbed Inlet

Abstract: In this study the unsteady behavior of the boundary layers developing on a LPT stator profile and their effect on secondary flow patterns in a 1.5-stage turbine configuration are investigated under the influence of periodic inflow perturbations. For this the experimental setup has been enhanced by hot-film sensor arrays placed on the stator profiles to provide time-resolved data from within the passage. The inflow is perturbed by periodically passing bars and a modified T106-profile has been considered for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, some published works have diverged from this classic approach by incorporating more modern experimental methods. For example, Sinkwitz et al [9] and Lopez et al [10] utilized hot-film sensor arrays on the near-endwall suction surface, and Chemnitz and Niehuis [11] analyzed the potential of particle image velocimetry (PIV) in comparison to five-hole-probe (FHP) and constant temperature anemometry (CTA) measurements in turbine cascade exit flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, some published works have diverged from this classic approach by incorporating more modern experimental methods. For example, Sinkwitz et al [9] and Lopez et al [10] utilized hot-film sensor arrays on the near-endwall suction surface, and Chemnitz and Niehuis [11] analyzed the potential of particle image velocimetry (PIV) in comparison to five-hole-probe (FHP) and constant temperature anemometry (CTA) measurements in turbine cascade exit flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%