2009
DOI: 10.1021/jp907476q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Resolved EPR Spectra of Spin-Correlated Radical Pairs: Spectral and Kinetic Modulation Resulting from Electron−Nuclear Hyperfine Interactions

Abstract: This paper expands the established four-state model of spin-correlated radical pairs (SCRPs) to include local nuclear spins which are ubiquitous in real-world systems and essential for the radical pair intersystem crossing (RP-ISC) mechanism. These nuclei are coupled to the unpaired electron spins by hyperfine interaction and split their electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) lines. Rather than enumerating all possible nuclear states, an algorithm is devised to sort out the net hyperfine offset 2Q, which, along… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the stronger the magnetic field B 0 is relative to the size of the dipolar interaction (parameterized by D and E ) in the triplet state, the smaller the population difference between the high-field levels |T + 〉 and |T − 〉 despite the non-Boltzmann population of the zero-field levels. 70 In this so-called “high-magnetic-field limit”, where the energies of |T + 〉 and |T − 〉 states increase and decrease, respectively, in a linear fashion with the external magnetic field B 0 , one expects increasingly symmetric TREPR spectra. In other words, the higher the magnetic field, the more efficiently the enhanced absorptive and emissive spectral contributions will cancel out, and the more the integral of the signal intensity over the magnetic field will approach zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the stronger the magnetic field B 0 is relative to the size of the dipolar interaction (parameterized by D and E ) in the triplet state, the smaller the population difference between the high-field levels |T + 〉 and |T − 〉 despite the non-Boltzmann population of the zero-field levels. 70 In this so-called “high-magnetic-field limit”, where the energies of |T + 〉 and |T − 〉 states increase and decrease, respectively, in a linear fashion with the external magnetic field B 0 , one expects increasingly symmetric TREPR spectra. In other words, the higher the magnetic field, the more efficiently the enhanced absorptive and emissive spectral contributions will cancel out, and the more the integral of the signal intensity over the magnetic field will approach zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coherent spin states of electrons and nuclei are being actively investigated for quantum information processing (QIP) applications using pulse magnetic resonance techniques. An important challenge in this field is the development of spin systems in which the initial spin states are well-defined. Photoexcitation of covalently linked donor (D)–chromophore (C)–acceptor (A) triads (D–C–A) has been shown to result in sub-nanosecond nonadiabatic electron transfer leading to D •+ –C–A •– spin-correlated radical pairs (SCRPs) with well-defined initial singlet spin states (| S ⟩). The initially formed singlet SCRP, 1 (D •+ –C–A •– ), undergoes hyperfine coupling-induced intersystem crossing in a few nanoseconds to produce the triplet SCRP, 3 (D •+ –C–A •– ), provided that the electron spin–spin exchange ( J ) and dipolar ( D ) interactions between the two radicals are comparable to, or smaller than, the electron–nuclear hyperfine interactions in the radicals. Application of a magnetic field, B 0 , results in Zeeman splitting of the SCRP triplet sublevels, which at the high fields typical of EPR spectroscopy are the | T +1 ⟩, | T 0 ⟩, and | T –1 ⟩ eigenstates that are quantized along B 0 , while the | S ⟩ state energy remains field invariant (Figure A). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its physical clarity, the CFN model has enjoyed impressively wide applications [75][76][77][78][79][80]. However, as new experimental observations become available, it was gradually recognized that the CFN model fit experimental data only under certain conditions.…”
Section: History the Closs-forbes-norris (Cfn) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%