Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing - STOC '93 1993
DOI: 10.1145/167088.167256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time optimal self-stabilizing synchronization

Abstract: In the network synchronization model, each node maintains a local pulse counter such that the advance of the pulse numbers simulates the advance of a clock in a synchronous network. In this paper we present a tame optimai sel&stabilizing scheme for network synchronization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm utilizes some known techniques, namely the self-stabilizing synchronization [6] and the power-supply method [1]. We use a new version of the power-supply method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The algorithm utilizes some known techniques, namely the self-stabilizing synchronization [6] and the power-supply method [1]. We use a new version of the power-supply method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of self-stabilizing protocols was initiated by Dijkstra [14]. Reset-based approaches to self-stabilization are described in [27,3,7,6,16,5]. One of the main drawbacks of this approach is that the detection mechanism triggers a system-wide reset in the face of the slightest inconsistency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this approach, the idea is that a special stabilizing mechanism monitors the system for illegal states, and whenever an inconsistency is detected, it invokes a special stabilizing reset protocol that imposes some legal global state on the system. The best reset protocols offer stabilization with relatively low space and communication overhead [10,9,11], but at a price of inherently high stabilization time-the cross-network latency time. Still, the time complexity of reset is better than the time-out approach for the following reason.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The correct state may either be some agreed upon fixed state, or a state that is in some sense "close" to the faulty state [16].) The best reset protocols in terms of time are given in [9], where the stabilization time is proportional to the diameter of the network. Logarithmic space protocols are given in [4,10], and a randomized constant-space protocol is given in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%