2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-lapse seismic tomography of an underground mining zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the expectations, the model resolved the cavity as a high‐velocity zone instead of a low‐velocity anomaly. This could be attributed to insufficient wave path coverage (mainly for refraction arrivals) across the mine, or possibly by the concentration of local stresses (Wang et al ., 2018). As a result, many of the first breaks ‐ possibly due to diffraction at the cavity ‐ may not have been correctly modelled, as indicated by the ray paths in Fig.…”
Section: Data Acquisition Analyses and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the expectations, the model resolved the cavity as a high‐velocity zone instead of a low‐velocity anomaly. This could be attributed to insufficient wave path coverage (mainly for refraction arrivals) across the mine, or possibly by the concentration of local stresses (Wang et al ., 2018). As a result, many of the first breaks ‐ possibly due to diffraction at the cavity ‐ may not have been correctly modelled, as indicated by the ray paths in Fig.…”
Section: Data Acquisition Analyses and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location results in this study are similar to those obtained by the 3D Gaussian beam-based method, proving that the location method considering finite-frequency effects of wave propagation is significantly superior to the geometric ray tracing-based location. According to Wang et al [50] and Virieux and Operto [51], the velocity model used in this paper has a resolution of about 50 m. In addition, the Gaussian beam-based method approximately solves the wave equations in a local region around the ray path, thus, partial ray tracing operation is still needed. The modeling accuracy of the Gaussian beam method is lower than that of numerically solving the complete wave equation.…”
Section: Ms Location Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the proposed 3D GSWI location method, the 3D velocity model inverted through ray tracing tomography based on P wave travel-time data by Wang et al [50] and shown in Section 4.1 was selected as the target velocity model. Moreover, velocity models with different smoothing scales were used to verify the importance of velocity model accuracy to the 3D GSWI location method.…”
Section: Synthetic Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies applied collaborative localization methods using analytical and iterative solutions for microseismic sources in underground mining. These studies filtered the abnormal arrivals using analytical solutions combined with the iterative method without premeasured average velocity to improve the location accuracy (Wang et al 2018;Dong et al 2019). These studies emphasized constructing the velocity discontinuities, including Conrad and Moho discontinuities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%