2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020jb020180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐Lapse Monitoring of Seismic Velocity Associated With 2011 Shinmoe‐Dake Eruption Using Seismic Interferometry: An Extended Kalman Filter Approach

Abstract: Seismic interferometry is a powerful tool to monitor the seismic velocity change associated with volcanic eruptions. For the monitoring, changes in seismic velocity with environmental origins (such as precipitation) are problematic. In order to model the environmental effects, we propose a new technique based on a state-space model. An extended Kalman filter estimates seismic velocity changes as state variables, with a first-order approximation of the stretching method. We apply this technique to three-compone… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(163 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculate PE for the vertical component of stations SMN, SMW, KIOH, KRS, and TKS after bandpass filtering the continuous waveforms between 1 and 7 Hz. This band corresponds mostly to volcanic activity and minimizes contributions from other sources, such as meteorological conditions or anthropogenic noise (Nishida et al 2020). Bandt and Pompe (2002) recommended that m = 3,…,7, L = 1 and W > > m!…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We calculate PE for the vertical component of stations SMN, SMW, KIOH, KRS, and TKS after bandpass filtering the continuous waveforms between 1 and 7 Hz. This band corresponds mostly to volcanic activity and minimizes contributions from other sources, such as meteorological conditions or anthropogenic noise (Nishida et al 2020). Bandt and Pompe (2002) recommended that m = 3,…,7, L = 1 and W > > m!…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreasing PE pattern before the 2018 eruption was less clear at all stations. The seismicity, tilt, and seismic velocity records also exhibited no significant precursory signals prior to the eruption and this was probably caused by the rapid ascent of magma (Yamada et al 2019;Nishida et al 2020;Matsumoto and Geshi 2021). Another possibility is that the decreasing pattern occurred several months prior to the 2018 eruption and the observation period of PE needs to be extended in order to identify such a decrease.…”
Section: Pe Variation During Periods II and Iiimentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plain Language Summary Continuous estimation of seismic velocity and seismic scattering property changes by passive interferometry using seismic ambient noise is a promising tool for monitoring volcanoes (Brenguier et al, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo104; Budi-Santoso & Lesage, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw145; Donaldson et al, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax6642; Machacca-Puma et al, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.05.014; Nishida et al, 2020, https://doi. org/10.1029/2020jb020180).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous estimation of seismic velocity and seismic scattering property changes by passive interferometry using seismic ambient noise (Curtis et al, 2006;Shapiro & Campillo, 2004) is a promising tool for monitoring volcanoes. Many previous studies have reported seismic velocity changes related to volcanic activity (Brenguier et al, 2008;Budi-Santoso & Lesage, 2016;Donaldson et al, 2017Donaldson et al, , 2019Hirose et al, 2017;Machacca-Puma et al, 2019;Nishida et al, 2020;Takano et al, 2017). In many cases, seismic velocity changes beneath volcanoes have been interpreted to be due to crack opening or closing by stress changes from magma pressurization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%