SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017 2017
DOI: 10.1190/segam2017-17673630.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-lapse full-waveform inversion for cross-well monitoring of microbubble injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute the largest V p reduction after fracture emplacement to the amount of gas bubbles (∼3%-4.5% gas saturation) accompany with the HRC injection. This V p reduction caused by gas bubbles is much more pronounced than less than 1% V p reduction by the microbubbles in the shallow sediments (Kamei et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We attribute the largest V p reduction after fracture emplacement to the amount of gas bubbles (∼3%-4.5% gas saturation) accompany with the HRC injection. This V p reduction caused by gas bubbles is much more pronounced than less than 1% V p reduction by the microbubbles in the shallow sediments (Kamei et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We attribute the largest V p reduction after fracture emplacement to the amount of gas bubbles (∼3%–4.5% gas saturation) accompany with the HRC injection. This V p reduction caused by gas bubbles is much more pronounced than less than 1% V p reduction by the microbubbles in the shallow sediments (Kamei et al., 2017). In addition, our results show further V p reduction caused by exsolution gas bubbles from water pores within the fracture, which was not detected in the tomographic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borehole seismic measurements (VSP and crosswell seismics) provide more accurate, higher resolution images than surface seismic measurements due to the location of the receivers and/or sources close to the target and due to relatively lower sensitivity to near-surface heterogeneities. Time-lapse crosswell seismic traveltime tomography and waveform inversion have been used, for instance, to monitor changes in rock/soil-dynamic properties (e.g., Fehler and Pearson, 1984), to enable dynamic interpretation of shallow hydrosystems (e.g., Kamei et al, 2017), and to detect velocity changes due to CO2 injection (e.g., Saito et al, 2006;Luth et al, 2011;Ajo-Franklin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crosswell seismic measurements provide very high resolution images with high accuracy because both sources and receivers are installed in depth close to the target and seismic signals are less affected by near-surface heterogeneities. Time-lapse traveltime tomography and full waveform inversion (FWI) are, among others, applied to detect temporal changes of subsurface properties between boreholes (e.g., Saito et al, 2006;Luth et al, 2011;Ajo-Franklin et al, 2013;Kamei et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%