“…climatic) in£u-ences on a spatio-temporal scale. In the biotic environment, two interactions have been reported to be a main in£uence on ungulate abundance: (i) intrinsic, density-dependent e¡ects (¢gure 1: 22 ) have, through depressed female fecundity and juvenile survival, a negative e¡ect on ungulate abundance (see, for example, Sauer & Boyce 1983;Clutton-Brock et al 1987a,b;Putman et al 1996 and references therein), often lagged several years in time (see, for example, Fryxell et al 1991); (ii) increased spatial and temporal abundance of plants, as documented through available biomass and length of the annual growth season, have been documented to increase ungulate abundance (¢gure 1: 12 ) through the e¡ects of increased body weight and thus reproductive performance as well as decreased age at maturity (see, for example, Albon et al 1983;Albon & Clutton-Brock 1988;Forchhammer 1995;Langvatn et al 1996). Also, the abiotic environment of both ungulates and plants exerts a considerable e¡ect on their respective abundances: (i) winter mortality of ungulates is negatively in£uenced by climatic conditions such as temperature, rainfall and duration of snow cover, resulting in a 1-year lagged depression of abundance (¢gure 1: 0 32 ) Mech et al 1987;Albon & Clutton-Brock 1988;OwenSmith 1990;Putman et al 1996); (ii) the spatio-temporal abundance of plants is considerably a¡ected by climatic conditions, primarily without time-lags (¢gure 1: 0 31 ), such as increased available biomass following increased amount of rainfall (Sinclair 1979;Owen-Smith 1990) and increased length of the annual growth season following increased length of snow lie (Langvatn & Albon 1986;Langvatn et al 1996;Post & Stenseth 1998a).…”