2024
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04812-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time in ICU and post-intensive care syndrome: how long is long enough?

Dylan Flaws,
John F. Fraser,
Kevin Laupland
et al.

Abstract: Background Our understanding of post-ICU recovery is influenced by which patients are selected to study and treat. Many studies currently list an ICU length of stay of at least 24, 48, or 72 h as an inclusion criterion. This may be driven by established evidence that prolonged time in an ICU bed and prolonged ventilation can complicate post-ICU rehabilitation. However, recovery after short ICU stays still needs to be explored. Methods This is a sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has shown promising results in the field of critical care physical assessment, together with the critical care physical assessment instrument (CPAx). Though lengthier stays in ICUs have been associated with PICS and post-admission morbidities, there have been cases where patients admitted for only one to two days to the ICU also experienced post-admission morbidities [ 27 ]. Weissman et al utilized natural language processing techniques to evaluate the recording of critical disease characteristics in discharge records [ 25 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has shown promising results in the field of critical care physical assessment, together with the critical care physical assessment instrument (CPAx). Though lengthier stays in ICUs have been associated with PICS and post-admission morbidities, there have been cases where patients admitted for only one to two days to the ICU also experienced post-admission morbidities [ 27 ]. Weissman et al utilized natural language processing techniques to evaluate the recording of critical disease characteristics in discharge records [ 25 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%