2011
DOI: 10.1021/ac103207r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Gated Luminescence Microscopy Allowing Direct Visual Inspection of Lanthanide-Stained Microorganisms in Background-Free Condition

Abstract: Application of standard immuno-fluorescence microscopy techniques for detection of rare-event microorganisms in dirty samples is severely limited by autofluorescence of nontarget organisms or other debris. Time-gated detection using gateable array detectors in combination with microsecond-lifetime luminescent bioprobes (usually lanthanide-based) is highly effective in suppression of (nanosecond-lifetime) autofluorescence background; however, the complexity and cost of the instrumentation is a major barrier to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After an eyepiece (103, Stock No. NT36-130, Edmund Optics) at the detection port, a compact mechanical chopper (C-995, Terahertz Technologies) was positioned at the beam focus to generate a rapid on-off switching time (19,20). A second identical eyepiece was used to collect the diverging TGL into the detector, either a channel PMT (CPMT, MH1372, PerkinElmer) for rapid scanning of ''elements of interest" or a color CCD camera (2 mega pixels, DS-Vi1, Nikon) or the naked eye for visual confirmation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an eyepiece (103, Stock No. NT36-130, Edmund Optics) at the detection port, a compact mechanical chopper (C-995, Terahertz Technologies) was positioned at the beam focus to generate a rapid on-off switching time (19,20). A second identical eyepiece was used to collect the diverging TGL into the detector, either a channel PMT (CPMT, MH1372, PerkinElmer) for rapid scanning of ''elements of interest" or a color CCD camera (2 mega pixels, DS-Vi1, Nikon) or the naked eye for visual confirmation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light emitted at a large solid angle ([458) is collected by a UV-fused silica plano-convex lens (f 5 35.mm; Ø51 inch, Thorlabs LA4052UV), which is then redirected by a dichroic mirror (365 DCLP BS, http://www.chroma.com/) into the UV objective. Though mechanical chopper gating has been reported with slow switching times of 100-200 ls (14,32-36), we employed a new compact fast chopper (C995 Optical Chopper, Terahertz Technologies, NY; 167 rotating cycles per second) (30,37) and a new optics configuration to achieve up to 11 ls switching time at 2.5-kHz repetition rate with a transparent/blocking duty ratio of 75%:25% (30). This duty ratio is achieved by laser micromachining of every second blades from original 30 blades down to 15 blades.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LED pulses were synchronized to a pinhole-assisted optical chopper unit allowing naked eye observation of time-gated bioimages (30). A commercially available relatively inexpensive UV objective (403, 240-360 nm, NA 5 0.50, a OFR objective from Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) was employed for efficient UV delivery in a standard epifluorescence microscopy structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a very long delay time cuts out the most intense emission from the phosphorescent probe, and a very long acquisition time leads to noise integration at the end of the decay. If the luminescent probe decay is a single-exponential function, then the phosphorescence signal intensity decreases as in the range 0.5-2.5 ms so that, ideally, t 1 should be in the range 50-250 ms and t 2 in the range 1.5-7.5 ms. Because most of the TRL microscopes used to date are modifications of epifluorescence microscopes and are fitted with a combination of a fast switching pulsed light-emitting diode and a chopper [36], long acquisition times can be implemented. Reported windows are, however, in the range 0.1-5 ms only, which explains why actual improvements are less than predicted.…”
Section: Time-resolved Luminescence Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%