2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0642-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time from autologous to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation impacts post-transplant outcomes in multiple myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensity and duration of preceding therapy are associated with outcomes after allogeneic SCT, similar to findings from previous retrospective studies [3,27]. Patients transplanted in first or second line had superior OS and PFS as compared with patients with 3 and more lines of therapy before transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The intensity and duration of preceding therapy are associated with outcomes after allogeneic SCT, similar to findings from previous retrospective studies [3,27]. Patients transplanted in first or second line had superior OS and PFS as compared with patients with 3 and more lines of therapy before transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“… 25 , 34 The first immunotherapy for MM was an allogeneic stem cell transplant, which remains a routine treatment for the long‐term management of high‐risk diseases. 35 In the mid‐2000s, immunomodulatory drugs designed to improve the immunomodulatory and anticancer properties and tolerability profiles of treatments; such as thalidomide, were shown to be effective in MM and substantially improved survival. 36 The next generation of immunotherapies for MM comprises monoclonal antibodies, 37 chimeric antigen receptor T cells, 38 bispecific antibodies, 39 antibody drug conjugates, 40 and checkpoint inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In various studies remission status at allo-SCT was also a relevant predictor for survival with significantly longer OS and/or PFS in patients responding to induction as compared to those with progressive disease at the time point of transplantation [ 17 , 18 , 36 , 43 , 45 , 51 , 67 , 75 , 77 , 78 , 80 , 81 , 82 ]. The role of minimal residual disease (MRD)-status was analyzed in the post-transplant setting and is not conclusively clarified at this time: Achievement of MRD-negativity by flow cytometry after transplantation led to a survival benefit in a large retrospective analysis [ 76 ], whereas another trial could not prove a difference [ 82 ].…”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expectedly, younger patient age [ 73 , 75 , 78 , 80 , 82 ], a good performance status [ 43 ] and participation in clinical trials [ 44 ] were found to be associated with a better outcome.…”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%