2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-frequency-topographic analysis of induced power and synchrony of EEG signals during a Go/No-Go task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, GBA is synchronized among different brain areas, e.g. in the visuospatial matching process between occipital and parietal lobes, and in the preparatory stage for motor responses to visual stimuli between the frontocentral and parietooccipital lobes [4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,27]. Generally, GBA was found to be increased in association with cognitive processing in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, GBA is synchronized among different brain areas, e.g. in the visuospatial matching process between occipital and parietal lobes, and in the preparatory stage for motor responses to visual stimuli between the frontocentral and parietooccipital lobes [4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,27]. Generally, GBA was found to be increased in association with cognitive processing in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…They suggested that GBO of early latency may be related to a process of discrimination of stimuli, while GBO of late latency may be related to a process of execution of finger movement associated with go stimuli or a process of inhibition associated with no-go stimuli. On the other hand, Harmony et al [27] proposed that the difference between conditions was observed in the synchronization increases of the γ band between 33 and 36 Hz in the go condition, whereas synchrony decreased at these frequencies in the no-go condition; these differences may be due to the preparation and execution of the motor response during the go condition and its inhibition in the no-go condition. In our study, there was no stimulus ERS in the go condition, but ERD between 33 and 36 Hz at Cz in the no-go condition was observed similar to their report [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This wave is usually modulated by correctly or incorrectly inhibited responses, with larger amplitudes for unsuccessfully stopped (US) than for successfully stopped (SS) responses (Dimoska, Johnstone, & Barry, 2006;Kok et al, 2004;Ramautar et al, 2006). Time-frequency data have shown that the N2 is associated with theta oscillations (around 4-7 Hz) over fronto-central scalp areas, an activity also related to conflict detection and error processing (Harmony, Alba, Marroquín, & González-Frankenberger, 2009;Harper, Malone, & Bernat, 2014;Kirmizi-Alsan et al, 2006;Luu, Tucker, & Makeig, 2004;Müller & Anokhin, 2012). The neural generator of the N2 is presumed to be located around the dorsal portion of the anterior cingulate cortex (Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004;Braver, Barch, Gray, Molfese, & Snyder, 2001;Nieuwenhuis, Yeung, van den Wildenberg, & Ridderinkhof, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For illustrative purposes, we have applied the methodology described above to EEG data from a Go/NoGo task [17] designed to study the inhibition of the motor response. During this task, uppercase letters are shown on a screen, one at a time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%