2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40753-020-00116-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time for (Research on) Change in Mathematics Departments

Abstract: This research commentary argues for more research that attends to the processes of organizational change in mathematics departments. It outlines both the ways that research on organizational change can benefit scholarship in mathematics departments, and how mathematics education researchers are needed to develop theories of change that are contextualized to the teaching and learning of undergraduate mathematics. This commentary closes with a research agenda for moving this emergent field of study forward. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although calls for educational reforms are not new (e.g., Dewey 1902), sustained reforms resulting in student-centric teaching have been elusive (e.g., Kezar 2014;Lane et al 2020;Laursen 2019;Reinholz et al 2020;Stains et al 2018). Although "bottom-up" approaches that begin with instructors have long been theorized as having more potential for sustainability and impact (e.g., Darling-Hammond 1990), reforms that do not also attempt to address cultural change and power dynamics over time tend to be short-lived (e.g., Kezar 2014).…”
Section: Conceptualizing the Change Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although calls for educational reforms are not new (e.g., Dewey 1902), sustained reforms resulting in student-centric teaching have been elusive (e.g., Kezar 2014;Lane et al 2020;Laursen 2019;Reinholz et al 2020;Stains et al 2018). Although "bottom-up" approaches that begin with instructors have long been theorized as having more potential for sustainability and impact (e.g., Darling-Hammond 1990), reforms that do not also attempt to address cultural change and power dynamics over time tend to be short-lived (e.g., Kezar 2014).…”
Section: Conceptualizing the Change Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although "bottom-up" approaches that begin with instructors have long been theorized as having more potential for sustainability and impact (e.g., Darling-Hammond 1990), reforms that do not also attempt to address cultural change and power dynamics over time tend to be short-lived (e.g., Kezar 2014). Effective leadership for education innovations is a promising approach (Spillane and Diamond 2007), but little research on higher education leadership in mathematics exists (Elrod 2020;Reinholz et al 2020). Kezar and Gehrke (2015) define a community of transformation as a "distributed community of individuals that uses a core philosophy to create and foster new practices that can be integrated into the various institutions in which individuals work" (p. 20).…”
Section: Conceptualizing the Change Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of educational development, we should aim high -for department-level research-based interventions (cf. Dolmans et al, 2016;Kember, 2016;Reinholz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities, like organizations, consist of many individuals who may have competing priorities, goals, motivations, and expertise. Thus, organizational change research provides a useful starting point for understanding how change occurs in universities and guidance for how planning and decisions are made (Reinholz, Matz et al, 2019;Reinholz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, innovations are often forgotten and replaced. Thus, there is a pressing need to develop robust models for change in higher education (Kezar, 2011;Reinholz et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%